The End of the Second World War - Part 1 of 6

#1

OneManGang

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
1,993
Likes
9,446
#1
Author's Note: July 16 is the 62nd anniversary of the TRINITY detonation of the first nuclear device. It is as good a place as any to start a chronicle of the climactic events leading to the surrender of the Empire of Japan and the end of the most deadly war in human history. This series of essays - which will appear over the next three weeks - will attempt to take us back to those days. - Pat (The One Man) Gang

Trinity Monday

A God’s-eye view of the United States in July of 1945 would have revealed a nation truly mobilized for war. On both coasts, shipyards were disgorging vast numbers of sleek warships, fat transports and waddling tankers. Further inland, vast industrial complexes were churning out masses of trucks, jeeps, squat tanks and shiny warplanes. Hundreds of thousands of acres were host to military bases and airfields where millions of young men were being instructed in the deadly arts.

It would have been very easy in this Olympian vision to overlook things with great significance. It would be understandable to pass over factories and facilities located in out-of-the-way places. While apparently quite busy, with thousands of workers and complicated infrastructure these plants seemed to produce …nothing.

400px-K-25_Aerial.jpg


The sprawling K-25 gaseous diffusion plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. (National Archives)

It was called the Manhattan Project.

It started with a letter. Three prominent physicists had fled Hungary as war clouds gathered in the late 1930s. They had contacts with colleagues in Nazi Germany and had found that those scientists were busily trying to harness the power of nuclear fission and that research could lead to weapons of unimaginable destructiveness. Upon reaching the United States, Leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner and Edward Teller found that nuclear research, in this country, was very much a cottage industry with only a few physicists devoting themselves to the subject. To beat Hitler at his own game would require much more.

In the summer of 1939 the three men prevailed on their most famous colleague, Albert Einstein, to help them compose and then add his signature to a letter to President Franklin Roosevelt outlining this threat and advocating increased research and development with an eye to creating (if possible) a weapon for the Allies. Unknown to the Hungarians, the Japanese were also doing some research into atomic weaponry as well.

Roosevelt endorsed Einstein’s letter and turned the problem over to the Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) a committee of leading individuals in science, industry and government set up to sort through various proposals, decide which were feasible, then oversee the resulting projects. OSRD recommended grants totaling $300,000.00 to begin the process.

By May, 1942, this initial research revealed there were five potential methods of producing adequate enriched Uranium for research and possibly for a weapon. The OSRD compiled a report of their progress to date and submitted it to the President with their recommendation that since no single method seemed the best, the quickest method of producing a usable weapon would be to pursue all five with massive funding and an absolute priority on resources. Roosevelt read the report, took a deep breath and scrawled OK, FDR on the top page.

America was going nuclear.

Overall responsibility for the project, now codenamed MANHATTAN, was given to the U.S. Army under the auspices of Secretary of War Henry Stimson and the Army Chief of Staff, General George C. Marshall. Marshall needed a man used to big projects and with a reputation for getting things done to lead the Manhattan Project and he knew just the man. The War Department was moving into the largest enclosed office building in the world in 1942, the Pentagon. In had been completed on time and under budget by a Colonel from the Corps of Engineers named Leslie R. Groves.

Groves was a human bulldozer capable of doing vast amounts of work and had a congenital aversion to delay. Groves knew little of theoretic physics or atomic theory, but he could tell when things were getting done and when the scientists were just arguing minor points among themselves for personal amusement. That latter was strictly verboten.

Groves tapped Dr. Robert Oppenheimer to handle the scientific side of the project while he, Groves, dealt with brick and mortar issues of supply, logistics and construction. The personal contrast between the determined, no-nonsense, bull-necked Groves and the rail-thin, brilliant and diffident Oppenheimer could not have been greater. The important thing was: it worked.

Groves_and_Oppy.jpg


General Groves and Robert Oppenheimer

By mid-1945, the Manhattan Project was the largest scientific research and development enterprise in history. Hundreds of billions of very pre-inflationary dollars had been spent. Huge leaps of scientific knowledge occurred. The atom had been split and now controlled fission reactors operated routinely in places like Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford Washington and Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Now, on July 16, 1945, Oppenheimer, Groves and a horde of the most brilliant scientists and engineers in the country gathered at a remote spot 50 miles west of Alamagordo, New Mexico to see if all the effort would actually pay off. There were two bomb designs, one using uranium-235 and another, potentially more powerful, using plutonium. There was not enough U-235 to make a test device so that design test would be an operational mission. There was enough plutonium for a test and that would have to do.

The test explosion was codenamed TRINITY.

They gathered in a bunker ten thousand yards from a hundred-foot steel tower with a shed on top. Inside that shed was the subject off all this interest. Looking like an oversized volleyball the test device nicknamed the “Gadget” waited. If this test worked, the circuitry would be condensed, an aerodynamic body would be fitted around an identical sphere in the Pacific, and the world would change – forever.

trinity.jpg


The “Gadget” in its shack atop the test tower at the TRINITY site.

Dr. Sam Allison, late of the University of Chicago, watched as a timer on the automatic detonation control wound down and gave the count … “Ten … nine …”

The official Army report, submitted by Brig. Gen. Thomas Farrell, gave the details:
“No man-made phenomenon of such tremendous power had ever occurred before. The lighting effects beggar description. The whole country was lighted by a searing light many times that of the midday sun. … Thirty seconds after the explosion came, first, the air blast pressing hard against people and things, to be followed immediately by the strong, sustained, awesome roar which warned of doomsday and made us feel we puny things were blasphemous to dare tamper with forces heretofore reserved to the Almighty. … It had to be witnessed to be realized.”

trinity.jpg


The TRINITY explosion.

Oppenheimer later recalled the effects of the explosion called to mind a passage from the Bhagavad-Gita, “I am become Death, the Shatterer of Worlds.”

Fittingly, the vast high desert where the Trinity test took place was known by the name the Spanish Conquistadors had given it centuries before: Journada del Muerto – The Journey of Death.
 
#2
#2
Good read. Nice writing. Thanks for putting that together. I look forward to your rest of your "series."

I've been extremely interested in the Manhattan project since I was about 11 or 12. I read what I could understand back then. I've read better works since. I love the history and the scientific endeavor surrounds it. Actually, my decision to become an engineer was shaped in many ways by studying about the project. My interest in it took me to Oak Ridge for a few years....before I headed back to school. Now, I am mainly interested in non-proliferation issues associated with nuclear programs - intelligence issues as well as the science/engineering of proliferation resistance.

So, this post was right up my alley. I'm sure I'll enjoy the "rest of the story" as Paul Harvey used to say as well.
 
#3
#3
Good read. Nice writing. Thanks for putting that together. I look forward to your rest of your "series."

I've been extremely interested in the Manhattan project since I was about 11 or 12. I read what I could understand back then. I've read better works since. I love the history and the scientific endeavor surrounds it. Actually, my decision to become an engineer was shaped in many ways by studying about the project. My interest in it took me to Oak Ridge for a few years....before I headed back to school. Now, I am mainly interested in non-proliferation issues associated with nuclear programs - intelligence issues as well as the science/engineering of proliferation resistance.

So, this post was right up my alley. I'm sure I'll enjoy the "rest of the story" as Paul Harvey used to say as well.

He still says it :good!:.
 
#6
#6
Maybe I'm jumping the gun here, because this issue comes into play after the Trinity test. But, does anyone have any opinions about the source of U-235 for the little boy bomb? I know that the US line is that it was manufactured at Y-12. Of course K-25 was also there at the time (as you show in your picture), but it wasn't enriching uranium yet. There is a fair amount of discussion that the U-235 sent to Los Alamos was actually recovered from Germany (I believe a U-boat). It is interesting how production at Y-12 shot up unbelievably fast to get enough uranium 235 for littleboy. I tend not to buy into it..but it does fall into the category of I could believe it.
 
#7
#7
Are you talking about the German sub that was intercepted in the Indian Ocean on its way to Japan?
 
#8
#8
Are you talking about the German sub that was intercepted in the Indian Ocean on its way to Japan?

I don't know the details about this part of the story. But, yes, that could be it. Essentially, those that support this notion point to receipts from New York (Harbor, I guess) that denote the storage of the material (supposedly). Do you know more details? Who am I kidding..of course you do :) .
 
#9
#9
This submarine, Unterseeboot (U-234) was sent to Japan in 1945 to deliver 560 kg of unprocessed uranium oxide for the Japanese program, as well as a disassembled Me 262 jet fighter and parts for some German-designed missiles (which would have been of little use for a primitive nuclear weapon). Two Japanese military officials and a number of German experts were also on board. The nuclear cargo was labeled "U-235," perhaps as a mislabeling of the submarine name, or perhaps in reference to the fissile isotope of uranium, uranium 235. It is extremely unlikely, though, that it was truly 560 kg of uranium-235—this would have been some eight times more of the rare element than was produced by the entire U.S. effort, and enough for Nazi Germany to have built many atomic bombs of their own with great ease. It is more likely that the uranium was un- or partially-enriched uranium oxide (which naturally has over 99% uranium 238). The submarine was ordered to surrender on May 10, 1945, two days after the overall German surrender, by Admiral Donitz. To avoid capture, the two Japanese officials, Lieutenant Commander Hideo Tomonaga and Lieutenant Commander Genzo Shoji, committed suicide and were buried at sea the next day. The submarine was boarded by US forces on May 14th and the cargo fell into U.S. hands.

Some reports claim that the 560 kg of uranium oxide was enough to build two atomic bombs, but this would mean that it was substantially enriched (and would have also meant that Germany could have developed its own bomb with it, which it did not). That amount of uranium, if enriched to around the 90% needed for an atomic bomb, would provide around 4 kg of bomb-grade material, far less than needed for an atomic bomb (the "Little Boy" uranium weapon dropped on Hiroshima used over 60 kg of uranium-235).
 
#10
#10
This submarine, Unterseeboot (U-234) was sent to Japan in 1945 to deliver 560 kg of unprocessed uranium oxide for the Japanese program, as well as a disassembled Me 262 jet fighter and parts for some German-designed missiles (which would have been of little use for a primitive nuclear weapon). Two Japanese military officials and a number of German experts were also on board. The nuclear cargo was labeled "U-235," perhaps as a mislabeling of the submarine name, or perhaps in reference to the fissile isotope of uranium, uranium 235. It is extremely unlikely, though, that it was truly 560 kg of uranium-235—this would have been some eight times more of the rare element than was produced by the entire U.S. effort, and enough for Nazi Germany to have built many atomic bombs of their own with great ease. It is more likely that the uranium was un- or partially-enriched uranium oxide (which naturally has over 99% uranium 238). The submarine was ordered to surrender on May 10, 1945, two days after the overall German surrender, by Admiral Donitz. To avoid capture, the two Japanese officials, Lieutenant Commander Hideo Tomonaga and Lieutenant Commander Genzo Shoji, committed suicide and were buried at sea the next day. The submarine was boarded by US forces on May 14th and the cargo fell into U.S. hands.

Some reports claim that the 560 kg of uranium oxide was enough to build two atomic bombs, but this would mean that it was substantially enriched (and would have also meant that Germany could have developed its own bomb with it, which it did not). That amount of uranium, if enriched to around the 90% needed for an atomic bomb, would provide around 4 kg of bomb-grade material, far less than needed for an atomic bomb (the "Little Boy" uranium weapon dropped on Hiroshima used over 60 kg of uranium-235).

no comment :p
 
#12
#12
Yeah...that sounds like the rumblings I have heard. I generally hear people dismiss it as garbage....especially those associated with Y-12!! :)

Like I said, because I didn't really buy into it - I had never studied the case they make in detail. Thanks for the details you provided.
 
#14
#14
Some more on the subject....

Disputed reports about the nuclear program in Konan in 1945

Very little is known about the size of the alleged atomic program in Konan though it is conventionally thought to have been small in comparison with the successful U.S. effort. In 1946, a journalist named David Snell working for the Atlanta Constitution wrote a sensationalist story which indicated that Japan had in fact successfully developed and tested a nuclear weapon in Konan. Snell was a former reporter, soon to become Life Magazine correspondent assigned to the 24th Criminal Investigation Detachment in Korea. He interviewed a Japanese officer who said he had been in charge of counter intelligence at the Konan project before the fall of Japan.

According to the officer, who used a pseudonym in the article because he was afraid of retaliation by occupation forces, the program was able to assemble a complete nuclear weapon in a cave in Konan and detonate it on August 12, 1945 on an unmanned ship nearby. Reportedly, the weapon produced a mushroom shaped cloud with a diameter of about 100 m (the first American bomb, "Trinity", had a mushroom cloud some three times the size of that), and also destroyed several ships in the test area. To the observers 20 mi (32 km) away, the bomb was brighter than the rising sun. The officer then claimed that the Russian Army, which captured Konan in November 1945 after some of the last fighting in the war, dismantled the Japanese project and shipped it and some of its scientists taken prisoner back to the Soviet Union.

Most mainstream historians dispute that the Japanese program got close to developing an atomic bomb but US intelligence took the possibility very seriously after Snell's article was published and continued to question repatriated Japanese from the Konan area about the project.

A 1985 book by Robert Wilcox reprinted the Snell interview as a basis for investigating the Japanese WWII nuclear efforts. In addition to detailing the known Japanese army and navy efforts, the book cites numerous intelligence reports and interviews which indicated the Japanese might have had an atomic program at Konan. It also gave evidence that the Japanese navy, taking up the atomic project after Nishina’s Riken had been destroyed, increased the Japanese efforts to make a weapon. The book, prefaced by Derek deSolla Price, Avalon professor of the history of science at Yale University, who endorsed it, was both panned and praised. Price wrote, “No longer can we maintain that a Japanese bomb just couldn’t have happened. Obviously it ‘nearly’ did. The only questions are how near and what does it do to our judgment on the one case we have of atomic warfare.” James L. Stokesbury, author of A Short History of World War II, wrote: “I had no idea the Japanese were working as seriously on an atomic bomb...this has to modify our perception of one of the crucial issues of the war.”

A review by a Department of Engery employee in the journal Military Affairs degraded it:
Journalist Wilcox' book describes the Japanese wartime atomic energy projects. This is a laudable, in that it illuminates a little-known episode; nevertheless, the work is marred by Wilcox' seeming eagerness to show that Japan created an atomic bomb. Tales of Japanese atomic explosions, one a fictional attack on Los Angeles, the other an unsubstantiated account of a post-Hiroshima test, begin the book. (Wilcox accepts the test story because the author [Snell], "was a distinguished journalist"). The tales, combined with Wilcox' failure to discuss the difficulty of translating scientific theory into a workable bomb, obscure the actual story of the Japanese effort: uncoordinated laboratory-scale projects which took paths least likely to produce a bomb. In the historical journal Isis, two historians of science said only of Wilcox's work that his thesis stood "on the flimsiest and most unconvincing of grounds," and surmised that the hidden agenda of such conspiracy theories was "to furnish a new exculpation for America's dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki."

An article published in the journal Intelligence and National Security in 1998, based on a review of many of the same documents used by Wilcox, and more, came to a similar conclusion. The article cites several US military intelligence documents and Japanese corporate records of the Nitchitsu firm that ran most of the industry in Hungnam and found no substantive evidence of any nuclear research program existing there during the war.

1946 Atlanta Constitution Atom Bomb Articles

Japan's WWII A-bomb Project in Hungnam, N Korea
 
#15
#15
Maybe I'm jumping the gun here, because this issue comes into play after the Trinity test. But, does anyone have any opinions about the source of U-235 for the little boy bomb? I know that the US line is that it was manufactured at Y-12. Of course K-25 was also there at the time (as you show in your picture), but it wasn't enriching uranium yet. There is a fair amount of discussion that the U-235 sent to Los Alamos was actually recovered from Germany (I believe a U-boat). It is interesting how production at Y-12 shot up unbelievably fast to get enough uranium 235 for littleboy. I tend not to buy into it..but it does fall into the category of I could believe it.

Don't know - I was under the impression that K-25 used one type of enrichment (gaseous diffusion) while another type was going on elsewhere (Los Alamos I thought). I thought Y-12 was an assembly/bomb facility rather than uranium source facility. I'm sure I'm wrong but that was my vague memory of things.

On a side note, I worked at Oak Ridge for about 2 years in grad school (X-10/ORNL with occassional trips to Y-12 where the bossman was). I really enjoyed my time there - what a trip!
 
#16
#16
Re: the U-235 for "Little Boy."

K-25 was indeed producing some enriched U-235 from uranium hexaflouride gas by late spring 1945, however, the enrichment was not enough to run through the cyclotrons at Y-12. K-25, at that time was not completed but enough was finished to start production. Then a third method was added called "Liquid Thermal Diffusion" which involved "stacks" of filters and such. This method had been developed largely under Navy supervison. This plant, code-named S-50, filled in the gap and by running the K-25 product through it and then through Y-12 produced just enough (about 10 lbs) of U-235 for the Little Boy device.

The reason there was no test for the U-235 device was that the physics of the "gun method" - firing a small amount of U-235 down a 5" cannon barrel into a subcritical mass of U-235 - was well enough understood that there was felt to be a high degree of reliability.

The Pu-239 device at TRINITY used an explosive "lense" design to focus the shock waves of the detonations onto a sphere of Plutonium and compress it into a critical mass - hence the plutonium bomb was called the "implosion" device. There was a great deal of doubt as to whether this would work or not. It was later discovered that the "gun method" was unsuitable for plutonium weapons anyway.

S-50 was dismantled shortly after the war when K-25 reached it's full capapbilities.
 
#17
#17
Don't know - I was under the impression that K-25 used one type of enrichment (gaseous diffusion) while another type was going on elsewhere (Los Alamos I thought). I thought Y-12 was an assembly/bomb facility rather than uranium source facility. I'm sure I'm wrong but that was my vague memory of things.

On a side note, I worked at Oak Ridge for about 2 years in grad school (X-10/ORNL with occassional trips to Y-12 where the bossman was). I really enjoyed my time there - what a trip!

Y-12's original mission was the enrichment of uranium using cyclotrons. So, you're right...K-25 was the gaseous diffusion plant that was used for years in Oak Ridge. However, Y-12 originally enriched uranium as well. It didn't take on its weapons assembly/disassembly role until later. These were the missions when you were there I am sure, as when I was there. Y-12 didn't enrich uranium all that long because the gaseous diffusion technology beat its socks off as far as throughput is concerned.
 
#18
#18
Re: the U-235 for "Little Boy."

K-25 was indeed producing some enriched U-235 from uranium hexaflouride gas by late spring 1945, however, the enrichment was not enough to run through the cyclotrons at Y-12. K-25, at that time was not completed but enough was finished to start production. Then a third method was added called "Liquid Thermal Diffusion" which involved "stacks" of filters and such. This method had been developed largely under Navy supervison. This plant, code-named S-50, filled in the gap and by running the K-25 product through it and then through Y-12 produced just enough (about 10 lbs) of U-235 for the Little Boy device.

The reason there was no test for the U-235 device was that the physics of the "gun method" - firing a small amount of U-235 down a 5" cannon barrel into a subcritical mass of U-235 - was well enough understood that there was felt to be a high degree of reliability.

The Pu-239 device at TRINITY used an explosive "lense" design to focus the shock waves of the detonations onto a sphere of Plutonium and compress it into a critical mass - hence the plutonium bomb was called the "implosion" device. There was a great deal of doubt as to whether this would work or not. It was later discovered that the "gun method" was unsuitable for plutonium weapons anyway.

S-50 was dismantled shortly after the war when K-25 reached it's full capapbilities.

So, did uranium from K-25 via S-50 make its way to little boy? I did not know that. That is really an interesting piece of history. I've actually never heard of S-50. Where was it at?
 
#19
#19
K-25 and S-50 to Y-12 to Little Boy. I think the actual weapon assembly was done at Los Alamos.

S-50 was built next to the steam power plant at K-25. The power plant was there to insure an uninterrupted power supply to K-25 and also produced the steam for the S-50 process. At that time the steam power plant at K-25 was the largest in the world.

s50LR.jpg


S-50 is the low building on the left.
 
#20
#20
K-25 and S-50 to Y-12 to Little Boy. I think the actual weapon assembly was done at Los Alamos.

S-50 was built next to the steam power plant at K-25. The power plant was there to insure an uninterrupted power supply to K-25 and also produced the steam for the S-50 process. At that time the steam power plant at K-25 was the largest in the world.

s50LR.jpg


S-50 is the low building on the left.

OK. So S-50 was a building within K-25? The U-shaped building was not K-25, right? The entire complex was called K-25?
 
#21
#21
No, the "U" building is/was K-25. It's kind of shorthand to refer to the whole site as K-25 despite the fact there are a number of "K" buildings in the complex.

At the time it was completed the K-25 building was the largest enclosed structure in the world.
 
#23
#23
No, the "U" building is/was K-25. It's kind of shorthand to refer to the whole site as K-25 despite the fact there are a number of "K" buildings in the complex.

At the time it was completed the K-25 building was the largest enclosed structure in the world.

OK..I was thinking that it had another name. It is odd that they chose to name the building after the complex/plant name or vice versa. That isn't the case with Y-12 as far as I know (or X-10 / ORNL...but I know less about that).
 
#24
#24
Y-12 was originally just the building housing the cyclotrons just as X-10 was originally just the graphite reactor. In the beginning of the Manhattan Project the sites for the various plants were given letter codes: Site "K", or Site "X" for instance. Buildings within the Site were then given reference numbers: K-25 and X-10 are among the better known. Once the war was over and the veil of secrecy lifted somewhat, sites assumed the designation of their most important building hence K-25 and Y-12.

I am of a vintage that I can recall when travelers along the section of Hwy 58 (now Oak Ridge Turnpike) that runs by the K-25 complex were warned that only emergency stopping was allowed and that the taking of photographs was strictly verboten. These signs were still up in the mid-70s.

This map of the K-25 site might shed some light on this discussion of the letter/number designations:

ornl-k25-sitemap.gif
 
#25
#25
Like I said, I am not as familiar with X-10 or K-25. But I have never seen any mention of a Y-12 building the site was named after (perhaps you have some background information on this?).

Ground for the first production building at Y-12 was broken by Stone and Webster on Feb. 18, 1943. This was the first Alpha building, 9201-1. There would be two more like it, 9201-2 and 3. There were also two more slighly different Alpha buildings to be ordered by Groves, 9201-4 and 9201-5. These five buildings were complemented by the Beta track. In March 1943, Groves authorized the construction of the Beta tracks to be housed in 9204-1 and 9204-2. A later expansion by Groves added 9204-3 and 9204-4.

The first building shell to be completed was the "pilot plant" (training building for supervisors adn operations staffs). The name for this first building, 9731, was perhaps chosen to either be meaningless or confusing - its concrete floor pad is 731 feet above sea level.

Most of this information comes from Bill Wilcox, Jr. in "An Overview of the History of Y-12."

Unlike K-25 and the gaseous diffusion process, the electromagnetic separation process required uranium to be moved from building to building to complete the enrichment.

Do you know of a building at Y-12 that was originally called Y-12?
 

VN Store



Back
Top