HalfullVol
Ain't it Funky now - JB
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4,811
- Likes
- 8,870
You mean it's not already to you?Then you would have a new league entirely. The last thing that needs to happen is for rich folks to be the owners of college sports teams. If that were to happen, college sports would be the same to me as professional sports leagues and, as I have with professional sports teams, I would quit watching.
In some regards, yes, but when teams have owners, they are more likely to interfere with the teams than how it is now. Imagine if you will, it goes that way, and the owner decides he wants a new stadium and the school doesn't, will the owner move the team to a different state? There are way more negatives to this than positives.You mean it's not already to you?
Team payrolls of $20 Million.
Multi Billion dollar media deals.
The courts on the verge of calling the players athlete employees of the schools.
Besides, the current owners of the teams, the schools with $200 Million revenue from athletics, aren't poor.
It's pro sports.
Agree, entirely. I'm just against the schools owning franchises too. It's an enormous mess that's likely to cause lesser funded schools to have to abandon athletics or the court to separate schools like UT as pro and ETSU (just an example school) as collegiate.In some regards, yes, but when teams have owners, they are more likely to interfere with the teams than how it is now. Imagine if you will, it goes that way, and the owner decides he wants a new stadium and the school doesn't, will the owner move the team to a different state? There are way more negatives to this than positives.
News flash---rich guys have been in college ball foreverThen you would have a new league entirely. The last thing that needs to happen is for rich folks to be the owners of college sports teams. If that were to happen, college sports would be the same to me as professional sports leagues and, as I have with professional sports teams, I would quit watching.