The Gillibrand Amendment -

#1
HarsinVol

HarsinVol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
623
Likes
406
#1
The Gillibrand Amendment

The U.S. Senate requires the U.S. military and intelligence agencies to significantly increase the level of priority, coordination, and resources that they direct to the problem of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and share at least part of what they know or learn yearly with the American people. The proposal was filed on November 4, 2021, by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) as a probable amendment to the Fiscal Year 2022 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, H.R. 4350). The full U.S. Senate may take up that bill before the end of November.

The Gillibrand Amendment would continue and accelerate a process visibly begun in the 2019-2020 Congress under the leadership of Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Senator Mark Warner (D-VA).

Will Congress now boldly go where no Congress has gone before?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol and tbh
#3
#3
"Gillibrand's language gives implicit reference to the confident belief of those in the U.S. government and military who have studied these UFOs that they are not of U.S., Chinese, or Russian origin. Sitting on the Intelligence and Armed Services committees, Gillibrand has received classified briefings (including classified imagery) that make conventional terrestrial explanations of some UFOs difficult to accept because, for example, of their lack of obvious control surfaces, their unconventional flight patterns and behavior, the lack of obvious means of propulsion capabilities, their extraordinary propulsion capabilities (tens of thousands of miles an hour in the air, and hundreds of knots underwater), and their apparent means of cloaking or concealing their presence."
 
#4
#4
"Why include “transmedium” in this new “Aerial and Transmedium Phenomena Advisory Committee.” Do they confirm they might have bases under the oceans? Undersea bases make sense in many ways: They’d be hard to detect, impossible to observe by typical satellites, and would allow for complete operational privacy."
 
#5
#5
It's certainly interesting...and I'm glad that some Congresscritters on both sides of the aisle are taking interest in this sort of thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HarsinVol
#6
#6
I believe we'll see some pushback under the guise of economic feasibility, but it actually is fear of what discovery of extrahuman existence and activity would do to the fabric of our society.

My faith in God is structured to where extrahuman beings can exist without compromising scripture, but not everyone is built that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Orange#1, Matt2496, tbh and 2 others
#7
#7
AshG said:
I believe we'll see some pushback under the guise of economic feasibility, but it actually is fear of what discovery of extrahuman existence and activity would do to the fabric of our society.

My faith in God is structured to where extrahuman beings can exist without compromising scripture, but not everyone is built that way.
Click to expand...

Proof of extraterrestrial existence would shatter a great many people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Orange#1, Zues1, Ernest T. Vol and 1 other person
#8
#8
What hubris man must have to believe in a near infinite universe, aliens not only stumbled upon us but decided to visit. Our government is already so useless, let's not give them yet another excuse to waste our money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#9
#9
AshG said:
I believe we'll see some pushback under the guise of economic feasibility, but it actually is fear of what discovery of extrahuman existence and activity would do to the fabric of our society.

My faith in God is structured to where extrahuman beings can exist without compromising scripture, but not everyone is built that way.
Click to expand...
I am putting more belief in these are black op programs that get exaggerated to the point of UFO designation, rather than full blown ET.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs, Zues1, tbh and 1 other person
#10
#10
54
AshG said:
I believe we'll see some pushback under the guise of economic feasibility, but it actually is fear of what discovery of extrahuman existence and activity would do to the fabric of our society.

My faith in God is structured to where extrahuman beings can exist without compromising scripture, but not everyone is built that way.
Click to expand...

It is conscionable and unconscionable fear. There are posters on this forum whose fear, if they were to admit it, is paralyzing on this subject. ,For many, the ET presence submarines Scripture or at least how they interpret Scripture.

Congratulations. You have learned how to straddle the lines of realism and ideology.
 
#11
#11
LouderVol said:
I am putting more belief in these are black op programs that get exaggerated to the point of UFO designation, rather than full blown ET.
Click to expand...

I agree that some of the sightings are black ops, some may be 'white' ops but too many are neither.
 
#13
#13
AshG said:
I believe we'll see some pushback under the guise of economic feasibility, but it actually is fear of what discovery of extrahuman existence and activity would do to the fabric of our society.
Click to expand...

You must be joking. Congress, in general and in this administration in particular, has never seen an idea at which they're unwilling to throw trillions of dollars of other people's money.
 
#17
#17
DancingOutlaw said:
What hubris man must have to believe in a near infinite universe, aliens not only stumbled upon us but decided to visit. Our government is already so useless, let's not give them yet another excuse to waste our money.
Click to expand...
We can always hope ET and its ilk will rescue us from our crap .gov.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top