The NCAA Rules Committee is at it again....

#1
gardners_51609

gardners_51609

Get Heuped Up!
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
2,316
Likes
332
#1
Coaches of no-huddle offenses blast NCAA rules proposal - ESPN

If the NCAA Football Rules Committee gets its way, college football teams no longer will be penalized 15 yards if one of its players really didn’t target an opposing player.

But teams could actually be penalized for delay of game for – get this – playing too fast.

A few coaches of teams that utilize no-huddle, hurry-up offenses – which are becoming more and more common at the FBS level – immediately blasted the proposed substitution rules change, saying its only intention is to slow them down.
Click to expand...

How do you guys suppose this will affect our offensive mindset coming into this year? It seems to target the faster moving offensive schemes.
 
#3
#3
All these coaches saying "where's the proof?!?"

The proof is in the amount of plays run, therefore more chances to get injured on both sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5
#5
#7
#7
More plays do not necessarily mean more injuries. More plays could leads to less substitutions which may lead to less 400 pound lineman that can pancake QBs. Or those 400 pound lineman are so tired they can't pancake the QB.
 
#8
#8
gardners_51609 said:
Coaches of no-huddle offenses blast NCAA rules proposal - ESPN



How do you guys suppose this will affect our offensive mindset coming into this year? It seems to target the faster moving offensive schemes.
Click to expand...

I can see how this will play out. There will be five seconds in the game against Bama. Our kicker is ready, rushes onto the field, and BOOM, wins the game. Pandamonium ensues, then the camera goes to the ref, who has called a penalty on us for playing too fast. Bama wins again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 people
#9
#9
goldvol said:
I can see how this will play out. There will be five seconds in the game against Bama. Our kicker is ready, rushes onto the field, and BOOM, wins the game. Pandamonium ensues, then the camera goes to the ref, who has called a penalty on us for playing too fast. Bama wins again.
Click to expand...

Read the artical.
The rule is not in place for the last 2 min.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10
#10
goldvol said:
I can see how this will play out. There will be five seconds in the game against Bama. Our kicker is ready, rushes onto the field, and BOOM, wins the game. Pandamonium ensues, then the camera goes to the ref, who has called a penalty on us for playing too fast. Bama wins again.
Click to expand...

orangeslice13 said:
Read the artical.
The rule is not in place for the last 2 min.
Click to expand...

This.
 
#11
#11
Rickmanvol said:
More plays do not necessarily mean more injuries. More plays could leads to less substitutions which may lead to less 400 pound lineman that can pancake QBs. Or those 400 pound lineman are so tired they can't pancake the QB.
Click to expand...

It leads to more opportunities to get injured, though. That's irrefutable.
 
#13
#13
I'm not a huge fan of the hurry up offenses but I don't like the idea of a rule that limits a team's ability to run what they want to run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#16
#16
crusse10 said:
It leads to more opportunities to get injured, though. That's irrefutable.
Click to expand...

Culls out fat specialty players prone to cardiac arrest...equally irrefutable :cheer:
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#20
#20
Stanford has no problems stopping up tempo offenses maybe saban and BB should adjust instead of crying about it....and everyone talks about player safety I don't see why both the offense and defense are on the field the same amount of plays if the offense does not make a sub....and the OL for the offense is out there the entire time!! Player safety is just bs to me
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#21
#21
“My suggestion is rather than spending a bunch of time coming up with a bunch of really stupid rules, spend that time coaching harder.”

Mike Leach is throwing it down toward ole Nicky. I love it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#22
#22
I think this only helps the game of football. Defensive schemes aren't fun to watch anymore because all they do is run a zone with as many athletes on the field as possible to counter the read option. The read option is for the Navy who can't get a true QB on a regular bases. This rule is going to help distinguish the teams who run and read option but also develop their QBs to be true defensive reading pocket passers and the teams who don't. This is going to make games more competitive, and I also think it's a great evaluation tool for the NFL because it's going to weed out those QBs who are a product of a system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#24
#24
crusse10 said:
All these coaches saying "where's the proof?!?"

The proof is in the amount of plays run, therefore more chances to get injured on both sides.
Click to expand...

It does not necessarily follow that more opportunities for injury will cause more injuries.

A reasonable solution would be for coaches to use smaller, more fit defensive linemen. That *might* actually decrease injuries.
 
#25
#25
If it ain't broke don't fix it. How many teams can get lined up and snapped the ball in ten seconds in the first place. What about first downs? What was oregons average time between plays? This is just gonna add another chance for refs to make a screw up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top