All of my training and experience and education has been in playwriting. I have no political sophistication or media sophistication, so if I was talking to Howard Kurtz or you, you could easily dismantle whatever argument Im going to make. It is a laymans amateur argument. Oftentimes, I write about people who are smarter than I am and know more than I do, and I am able to do that simply by being tutored almost phonetically, sometimes. Im used to it. I grew up surrounded by people who are smarter than I am, and I like the sound of intelligence. I can imitate that sound, but its not organic. Its not intelligence. Its my phonetic ability to imitate the sound of intelligence. - Sorkin
Whats frustrating about Sorkins wheedling when talking about The Newsroom is that journalists arent really smarter than everybody else. They are not the elites. They never were. They are more curious and more well-read, because thats part of the job, really. Most anybody can do the job of a journalist provided they have the capacity to learn new things very quickly and the internal drive to do so.
Sorkin lacks this type of curiosity, so The Newsroom was bound to fail. In the pilot, McAvoys staff gets its scoops about the leaking oil platform not through work, but by a pure coincidence of connections by one of the staffers. Sure it happens sometimes, but throwing it out in the very first episode invalidates the entire concept behind the show and turns it into a celebration of newsroom connections by D.C. media elites. At one point, a staffer spits out scientific information about why underwater oil drilling presents such a geological hazard. When asked how he knew this information, the answer is not, Ive been studying this for the past two hours while you dip****s have been arguing about speaking truth to stupid and referencing Don Quixote. Instead he says he built a volcano once for a school science fair, which is insulting to everybody involved.