J C Higgins
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2017
- Messages
- 988
- Likes
- 1,601
If conferences, schools or the NCAA start passing rules limiting NIL money lawsuits will follow.NIL was a stupid, absurd idea from the beginning. When a player is at a school and performing well, and some business wants to pay him or her to
help promote a product, fine--but it should not be used for recruiting. It's a complete can of worms. This notion that student-athletes getting a full academic scholarship plus other benefits aren't treated well has always been activist nonsense.
I don't believe there was any "activist nonsense" about it. Everyone knows athletes are treated well, but they weren't getting a fair share of their earnings, and how can you tell someone they can't make money off of their own likeness? That's ridiculous. Besides, some of these folks can lose millions and millions getting injured repping our favorite colleges in any sport.. It was incredibly ridiculous in a "capitalist" economy to tell anyone that they can't make money off themselves if they're on a college scholarship.NIL was a stupid, absurd idea from the beginning. When a player is at a school and performing well, and some business wants to pay him or her to
help promote a product, fine--but it should not be used for recruiting. It's a complete can of worms. This notion that student-athletes getting a full academic scholarship plus other benefits aren't treated well has always been activist nonsense.
I don't believe there was any "activist nonsense" about it. Everyone knows athletes are treated well, but they weren't getting a fair share of their earnings, and how can you tell someone they can't make money off of their own likeness? That's ridiculous. Besides, some of these folks can lose millions and millions getting injured repping our favorite colleges in any sport.. It was incredibly ridiculous in a "capitalist" economy to tell anyone that they can't make money off themselves if they're on a college scholarship.
NIL was a stupid, absurd idea from the beginning. When a player is at a school and performing well, and some business wants to pay him or her to
help promote a product, fine--but it should not be used for recruiting. It's a complete can of worms. This notion that student-athletes getting a full academic scholarship plus other benefits aren't treated well has always been activist nonsense.
I agree. It's too late to stop this train that has already left the station and it's too far down the tracks. I've said all along that the larger schools with more, wealthier boosters will get the better athlete's because there will be more NIL money to entice kids to go to those schools.If conferences, schools or the NCAA start passing rules limiting NIL money lawsuits will follow.
Yes, the schools with wealthier alumni that support athletics will be the winners. That's why I think Oregon......Phil Knight and Nike $$$$) will benefit the most.I agree. It's too late to stop this train that has already left the station and it's too far down the tracks. I've said all along that the larger schools with more, wealthier boosters will get the better athlete's because there will be more NIL money to entice kids to go to those schools.