Sheik Yerbouti
Class of 2000
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Messages
- 2,362
- Likes
- 1,030
I'm specifically referring to the strip of the Bama receiver, and Tennessee's recovery in the 4th quarter.
How was this the ruling on the field? Wouldn't someone have to have blown a whistle for this actually to have been the ruling on the field? Can someone explain this to me?
I'm specifically referring to the strip of the Bama receiver, and Tennessee's recovery in the 4th quarter.
How was this the ruling on the field? Wouldn't someone have to have blown a whistle for this actually to have been the ruling on the field? Can someone explain this to me?
It was a blown call. Had forward progression stopped?...ehh, yeah. Had the whistle blown? Negative. Should have been a fumble!
It should have been a fumble, plain and simple. Let's just suppose for a moment, that the Bama player had broke loose from the scrum and ran it in for a touchdown. Do you think they would have called it dead due to forward progress?
Doubtful.
Whistle should have been blown but it wasn't so I think it was a live play and should have had fumble. I also can't remember what player it was but we got an unnecessary roughness call when our player could not control his momentum and accidently hit a Bama player late. I thought the play was not intentional and was not that violent and refs should have not threw flag.
Whistle should have been blown but it wasn't so I think it was a live play and should have had fumble. I also can't remember what player it was but we got an unnecessary roughness call when our player could not control his momentum and accidently hit a Bama player late. I thought the play was not intentional and was not that violent and refs should have not threw flag.[/QU
Neither had the whistle blown on the roughness call. I hope the coaches are teaching "play to the whistle." Remember when Memphis beat us with a touchdown when all Vols stopped playing at mid-field.
I will not deny that this statement is true for the most part, but that TD called back on Cooper for pass interference was a pathetic call.
It was not a hard pushoff by Cooper, but by definition of the rule it was offensive pass interference because Cooper used his hand to attempt to get separation from the defender. On the other hand (no pun intended), no whistle had blown signalling the play was over on the UT strip of the ball, so by definition of the rule the play was still live and the fumble recovery by UT should have stood.
I'm specifically referring to the strip of the Bama receiver, and Tennessee's recovery in the 4th quarter.
How was this the ruling on the field? Wouldn't someone have to have blown a whistle for this actually to have been the ruling on the field? Can someone explain this to me?
Whistle should have been blown but it wasn't so I think it was a live play and should have had fumble. I also can't remember what player it was but we got an unnecessary roughness call when our player could not control his momentum and accidently hit a Bama player late. I thought the play was not intentional and was not that violent and refs should have not threw flag.