And just like that all the positivity from Monday is gone and we're painfully reminded how great coaching is still the outlier with this team, not the norm....
Yep. A team down two guards, one senior and the other of which is a top ranked and highly skilled point guard, which doesn't have enough roster depth to make up for it. Losing Cooper was just a kick in the gut which we've not solved yet. I'm not trying to deflect coaching responsibility for some of the problems, either, but I think what we're seeing this year has as much to do (or maybe more) with recruiting misses as it does coaching misses -- combined with the horrible misfortune of losing those two guards. UT's down to almost nothing in the backcourt, and if Holly subs too far we go off the rails half the time. Her hands are tied at this point, or at least, it feels like they are. She's going to get whatever those first 5-6 players give her, and that's about all Tennessee can muster this year. We'll be lucky to have the gas to even get to the tournament, much less advance. I wasn't too surprised that they looked dead; they left everything they had at home in the Notre Dame game. Some guards should shoot the ball, and some should handle it ... right now we're short on the ones that can handle it, I guess.
I'm not looking to next year as an excuse, but once they reload and get Cooper back, I expect a better team. At substituting, if nothing else. Sigh.
Yep. A team down two guards, one senior and the other of which is a top ranked and highly skilled point guard, which doesn't have enough roster depth to make up for it. Losing Cooper was just a kick in the gut which we've not solved yet. I'm not trying to deflect coaching responsibility for some of the problems, either, but I think what we're seeing this year has as much to do (or maybe more) with recruiting misses as it does coaching misses -- combined with the horrible misfortune of losing those two guards. UT's down to almost nothing in the backcourt, and if Holly subs too far we go off the rails half the time. Her hands are tied at this point, or at least, it feels like they are. She's going to get whatever those first 5-6 players give her, and that's about all Tennessee can muster this year. We'll be lucky to have the gas to even get to the tournament, much less advance. I wasn't too surprised that they looked dead; they left everything they had at home in the Notre Dame game. Some guards should shoot the ball, and some should handle it ... right now we're short on the ones that can handle it, I guess.
I'm not looking to next year as an excuse, but once they reload and get Cooper back, I expect a better team. At substituting, if nothing else. Sigh.
Okay, win the LVs win, it is all because the players found a way and when they lose it is all about Holly.
Here is what this game showed. It exposed the myth that the LVs have the "talent" to be NC contenders.
Auburn beat us athletically; they were quicker and had more depth. That had to be one of the most tenacious defensive presses I have ever seen. They were relentless through the 2nd and 3rd quarters and never broke down by over committing (and that is good coaching on the part of Auburn). But, a press only works when you can dominant the other team athletically. Diamond and Mercedes were the only players we had who could match up. Jordan was over matched but she looked like Russell Westbrook compared to Middleton. Auburn were the sharks and poor Alexa was the blood soaked prey.
When you look at the stats, rebounding was dead even 30 to 31 (LVs), though I think a junk of the LV rebounds came when the game was effectively over and the shooting % was actually closer than I expected 50 to 46% (LVs). The big stat were the 22 turnovers that Auburn generated.
The LVs had not faced that kind of pressure and lacked the athleticism at their PG to cope with it.
So, yes Holly could have, in theory coached a better game, but her available answers were Middleton and Dunbar. Nothing against those players but in this game, that was like bringing safety scissors to a gun fight.
I've seen a lot of improvement with Russell this season. If she continues to grow her game, she will be a first round WNBA pick.
Diamond is no better than she was in high school. Her athleticism is off the charts, but she doesn't play team-first basketball. Unless her attitude changes, the team (and its chemistry) will continue to flounder with inconsistencies.
Looking back, it seems to me a whole lot of this teams problems started with the coming of DeShields. I know the team was not too good and it was thought she was a savior, but why did she leave her first school? Begins to smack of a certain football player we had this year...
Okay, win the LVs win, it is all because the players found a way and when they lose it is all about Holly.
Here is what this game showed. It exposed the myth that the LVs have the "talent" to be NC contenders.
Auburn beat us athletically; they were quicker and had more depth. That had to be one of the most tenacious defensive presses I have ever seen. They were relentless through the 2nd and 3rd quarters and never broke down by over committing (and that is good coaching on the part of Auburn). But, a press only works when you can dominant the other team athletically. Diamond and Mercedes were the only players we had who could match up. Jordan was over matched but she looked like Russell Westbrook compared to Middleton. Auburn were the sharks and poor Alexa was the blood soaked prey.
When you look at the stats, rebounding was dead even 30 to 31 (LVs), though I think a junk of the LV rebounds came when the game was effectively over and the shooting % was actually closer than I expected 50 to 46% (LVs). The big stat were the 22 turnovers that Auburn generated.
The LVs had not faced that kind of pressure and lacked the athleticism at their PG to cope with it.
So, yes Holly could have, in theory coached a better game, but her available answers were Middleton and Dunbar. Nothing against those players but in this game, that was like bringing safety scissors to a gun fight.
It would have helped if Holly would have during the timeouts slowed the game down and used all the players to get the ball across half court. I think we needed to play Auburn in a slower game some teams you just have to play that way. Not being able to beat the press is why we lost 22 turnovers. They were about plus 15 in shots attempted. Very hard to win with those stats.
It would have helped if Holly would have during the timeouts slowed the game down and used all the players to get the ball across half court. I think we needed to play Auburn in a slower game some teams you just have to play that way. Not being able to beat the press is why we lost 22 turnovers. They were about plus 15 in shots attempted. Very hard to win with those stats.
Looking back, it seems to me a whole lot of this teams problems started with the coming of DeShields. I know the team was not too good and it was thought she was a savior, but why did she leave her first school? Begins to smack of a certain football player we had this year...
You might want to both look back more closely and also watch Diamond play. Without her, this team would be in a very bad way.
I don't buy the fatigue excuse. They were tired in the second quarter after blowing out Auburn in the first ? Or tired right after the halftime break ?
True, Holly is shorthanded and Cooper may have helped some. But that is no excuse for the total collapse that occurred in the second and third quarters. What you saw in those 2 quarters was a team that appeared to be without the slightest idea of how a press should be broken.
Bty. There are successful teams whose starters
play 35+ minutes each in important games. Not ideal but it can be done if necessary and the team is properly prepared for it.
Please stop with the 'next year' stuff. We had Cooper last year, by the way--and had a horrible season. Talent, players, need to be coached--coached well, led well. We'll just muddle along as a complete mediocrity until the next AD hires a real coach.