Originally posted by therickbol@May 12, 2005 10:49 AM
This answer could become very lengthy, but I'll spare you soap box speech. Their numbers in high school are actually very similar. They are about the same height, but Childress is much stronger. Thomas is more athletic. Here is the thing, you can't just recruit by looking at the amount of stars that rivals.com gives to a player. Every year countless (a lot) players are "underrated" by the recruiting services. Thomas was rated higher because of his athletic ability. Bruce Pearl has seen Childress play enough that he feels that he is one of those players that slips through the cracks and is underrated. Being able to recognize a player like that is a big part of being successful at the mid-major college level. So, Pearl has apparently seen something in this kid that the shmucks from rivals.com didn't see. Not to mention, he fits the mold of the type of player that is successful in Pearl's system. What you read on rivals.com, scout.com, or any other recruiting service doesn't give you near as much insight into the players as Pearl had. So, personally I will trust what Pearl has seen from the players and assume that Childress would make a better UTK men's basketball player