tiger woods question.

[joevol320]

tiger has never come from behind to win a championship, why doesn't espn ever question this. they praise this guy as the greatest golfer, yet he can't come from behind that many do. no analysis ever questions this.

 

[Vols520]

tiger has never come from behind to win a championship, why doesn't espn ever question this. they praise this guy as the greatest golfer, yet he can't come from behind that many do. no analysis ever questions this.

This gets questioned all the time. And it's a ridiculous question. Who cares how you win majors.

He should be questioned for dominating?

 

[utvolpj]

how many come from behind when Tiger's in the lead to win a major? Is winning the US Open by 15 shots not more impressive than winning by one when you were trailing?

 

[GBO18]

Ummm that is what mostly they talked about Sunday.

 

[VolsSportsFan]

It's true that it's a pretty safe bet if he's not winning on Saturday, he's not going to win on Sunday, in a major at least. But the guy has won 14 freakin' majors, so I think that would be low on the criticism totem pole.

Look I'm no Tiger fan, but when he's on and really wants it, he's going to win about 90% of the time.

 

[hohenfelsvol]

how many come from behind when Tiger's in the lead to win a major? Is winning the US Open by 15 shots not more impressive than winning by one when you were trailing?

Not more impressive but viewers love the drama of a come from behind win

 

[TennesseeOrange]

He is always questioned about this. I would be interested to see the number of come from behind major wins some of the other greats have.

 

[govols/cc]

A lot of so called come from behind wins have been the leaders simply imploding.

 

[VolsSportsFan]

A lot of so called come from behind wins have been the leaders simply imploding.

This to. It's hard to come from behind sometimes unless the other guys don't start missing shots.