(rwemyss @ Jan 11 said:UGA couldn't have beaten Ark... it says they are 0-2 in the conf???
Anyway, I disagree they're a clone of us... they have more big men inside than we do. Not that they are highly talented, Bradshaw was guarding them most of the night, and they got shut down in the second half... but they do have more big guys than we do.
I understand MemphisVol, but tonight they had 2-3 Forwards on the court most of the game. They ran it a couple of times, but our ball pressure forced them to try a half court for most of the game... and finally, especially in the first half, a lot of their points were comming in the paint. So while you were speaking from the scouting report on what UGA has been doing all year, I spoke from what I saw at the game tonight.(MemphisVol @ Jan 11 said:Well, the "clone" comment comes from UGA's breakdown of the game from yesterday. Basically, their top 6 scorers are either guards or wings, they like to play 3-4 guards, and they prefer a wide-open speed game and outside shooting....
Sounds familiar to me...
They do have some bigger guys in the middle, but their center only averages 4 per game, and they end up being more distractions than tools. In the end, UGA's biggest difference from us is that they play better traditional defense, they rebound better, they have less raw talent, and while they prefer to shoot from the outside or on fast breaks we do it better.....
hehe OTS report... hmmm... I guess if I had a way to post from my phone... Hey freaky, how about making the site WAP enabled?!?! hehe(MemphisVol @ Jan 11 said:You got to go to the game and you didn't do a on-the-scene report thread you putz!?!?!
Give!
It sounds like you are exactly right (though their "wings" are small forwards)- how would you handle it if your normal game was a less talented version of your opponent's.... try to take advantage of their weakness in the paint...........