Trespass Bill

#1

n_huffhines

What's it gonna cost?
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
88,326
Likes
53,259
#1
Nobody is talking about this, so not the best source. Kind of puts a damper on free speech:

In the bill, Congress officially makes it illegal to trespass on the grounds of the White House, which, on the surface, seems not just harmless and necessary, but somewhat shocking that such a rule isn’t already on the books. The wording in the bill, however, extends to allow the government to go after much more than tourists that transverse the wrought iron White House fence.

Under the act, the government is also given the power to bring charges against Americans engaged in political protest anywhere in the country.

Under current law, White House trespassers are prosecuted under a local ordinance, a Washington, DC legislation that can bring misdemeanor charges for anyone trying to get close to the president without authorization. Under H.R. 347, a federal law will formally be applied to such instances, but will also allow the government to bring charges to protesters, demonstrators and activists at political events and other outings across America.

The new legislation allows prosecutors to charge anyone who enters a building without permission or with the intent to disrupt a government function with a federal offense if Secret Service is on the scene, but the law stretches to include not just the president’s palatial Pennsylvania Avenue home. Under the law, any building or grounds where the president is visiting — even temporarily — is covered, as is any building or grounds “restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance."

It’s not just the president who would be spared from protesters, either.

Covered under the bill is any person protected by the Secret Service. Although such protection isn’t extended to just everybody, making it a federal offense to even accidently disrupt an event attended by a person with such status essentially crushes whatever currently remains of the right to assemble and peacefully protest.

Hours after the act passed, presidential candidate Rick
Santorum was granted Secret Service protection.
For the American protester, this indeed means that glitter-bombing the former Pennsylvania senator is officially a very big no-no, but it doesn’t stop with just him. Santorum’s coverage under the Secret Service began on Tuesday, but fellow GOP hopeful Mitt Romney has already been receiving such security. A campaign aide who asked not to be identified confirmed last week to CBS News that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has sought Secret Service protection as well. Even former contender Herman Cain received the armed protection treatment when he was still in the running for the Republican Party nod.

Goodbye, First Amendment:
 
#3
#3
It's one of those things where it doesn't sound like a big deal if the gov't doesn't abuse it. Too bad you can't trust gov't not to abuse things.
 
#4
#4
It's one of those things where it doesn't sound like a big deal if the gov't doesn't abuse it. Too bad you can't trust gov't not to abuse things.

Which is why I think it's flown under the radar
 
#5
#5
And Ron Paul has refused Secret Service protection:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvrtD8kdewg[/youtube]
 
#7
#7
It's one of those things where it doesn't sound like a big deal if the gov't doesn't abuse it. Too bad you can't trust gov't not to abuse things.

people like volatile with think anything the government does is wonderful.
 
#9
#9
This is the anti-Salahi law...
 

Attachments

  • tareq-salahi-320.jpg
    tareq-salahi-320.jpg
    27.6 KB · Views: 16

VN Store



Back
Top