Pitt has the type of team they have almost every year--tough, physical, methodical, half-court style. What's ironic is that while Pitt's style seems perfect for NCAA tourney play, they almost always flame out fairly early--and I think the same could happen this year. Pitt is not a great scoring team--and they (and everybody) will play teams that can shoot the trey and score, and that's where they are vulnerable. I could not see this game, but surprised that Blair didn't score more. Connecticut is like Pitt in a lot of ways--tough, very tough defensively inside with Thabeet (who destroyed a very good Louisville team with his shot-blocking three weeks ago) but vulnerable in the same way: They aren't a great scoring team--they've barely got two dependable scores--guard A.J. Price and Adrian, who's tough but a bit of a tweener in size. Thabeet can score when he gets the ball very close to the basket, but that's the extent of his O game. Robinson is an outstanding athlete and rebounder but not a good shooter or scorer. The huskies miss Dyson--a very tough, athletic guard--excellent defensively on the perimeter and could take the rock to the basket. With him I think Uconn would have been in the final four; without him, it will be a lot tougher. North Carolina has more horses than anybody--but these two teams along with louisville, memphis, wake and duke are all good. Villanova is my wild card in the tourney this year--they score a LOT.