I'm getting tired of the "they won because we weren't prepared for their second string QB" argument. That makes absolutely no sense. If it did, then some crafty coach would just start switching QBs at random points in the game. But coaches have starters and usually play only one QB for a reason- they give their team the best chance to win.
I believe those teams whose QBs get injured end up winning despite the injuries for other reasons. But I would rather have to face a teams second string QB any day of the week, especially if it's because the starter was just injured in the first quarter of play. The new QB is going to be a lot less prepared to play us than we are to play him, not to mention all the timing with the other members of his team.
We lost to UF despite Driskel getting hurt in the fisrt quarter, not because of it!