TAF
Oh Yeah...I mean it!
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2007
- Messages
- 10,750
- Likes
- 37,159
Spent several years near Norman and following that league. There's a reason aTm wanted rid of their presence. They'll end up being seen like a hybrid of ND and bama in this league. Honestly, with Saban gone, the road to becoming the most hated team in all of college football just opened up for Texas. As you pointed out, hating Texas is inevitable. I'm already well down that road. Id rate them neck and neck with bama now and rapidly gaining on UGA.You will learn to hate Texas yes you will.
IMO, Georgia is like when Jed struck oil. You can't take the backwoods out of them regardless of their dollars.Spent several years near Norman and following that league. There's a reason aTm wanted rid of their presence. They'll end up being seen like a hybrid of ND and bama in this league. Honestly, with Saban gone, the road to becoming the most hated team in all of college football just opened up for Texas. As you pointed out, hating Texas is inevitable. I'm already well down that road. Id rate them neck and neck with bama now and rapidly gaining on UGA.
I didn't like the addition of the last four before those two!Who's happy that texas and oklahoma are in the SEC? Not me...Fans will get played more and more as the schools, networks, players all chase more
and more dollars....
But Jed was good people. georgia is a useless turd like Leif Crick...always scheming and slothy
View attachment 643502
I am surprised that they aren't hated even more than they are already, honestly. Lots of people are really upset about conference realignment. The economics of college sports are what ultimately is causing conferences to realign, and if Texas wasn't the proximate cause something else would have been, but the match that started the latest realignment fire was Texas forming the Longhorn Network.Spent several years near Norman and following that league. There's a reason aTm wanted rid of their presence. They'll end up being seen like a hybrid of ND and bama in this league. Honestly, with Saban gone, the road to becoming the most hated team in all of college football just opened up for Texas. As you pointed out, hating Texas is inevitable. I'm already well down that road. Id rate them neck and neck with bama now and rapidly gaining on UGA.
I think there is too much going on to focus on Texas only. NIL, other conference expansions that make even less sense, and cents, than Texas, expanded playoffs, all the NCAA legal cases. that spreads the anger and attention around.I am surprised that they aren't hated even more than they are already, honestly. Lots of people are really upset about conference realignment. The economics of college sports are what ultimately is causing conferences to realign, and if Texas wasn't the proximate cause something else would have been, but the match that started the latest realignment fire was Texas forming the Longhorn Network.
I think your ND/Bama hybrid description is very apt. They combine "big football school" with a fanbase that has many trendy, wine and cheese, big city-types in it. At least that is how A&M fans have described them to me.
I am surprised that they aren't hated even more than they are already, honestly. Lots of people are really upset about conference realignment. The economics of college sports are what ultimately is causing conferences to realign, and if Texas wasn't the proximate cause something else would have been, but the match that started the latest realignment fire was Texas forming the Longhorn Network.
I think your ND/Bama hybrid description is very apt. They combine "big football school" with a fanbase that has many trendy, wine and cheese, big city-types in it. At least that is how A&M fans have described them to me.
Nebraska and A&M left because of LHN. Instead of having a conference-wide network, Texas opted for having their own thing. That is what splintered the conference, for better or worse.I think Texas gets too much hate for demise of Big12 and Nebraska/Colorado don't get enough.
Nebraska and Colorado were the first to leave. Nebraska came off as sour grapes: "we can't win anymore because Texas makes more money so we will leave." Nebraska was in the weaker Big12 division and frankly should have won it most years.
Nebraska has a good spot right now in the B1G (or at least they were until this year). Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State, and Penn State were all in the other division. No top 15 program in their division besides Nebraska itself but they still couldn't win.
Colorado wanted to be "cool and liberal" with the West Coast but it blew up in their face and now they are back in the Big12.
Both should have just stayed and kept Big12 together. Chances are the Big12 would still be rolling and Pac12 would still be around had that happened.
I don't see why these leagues just couldn't schedule stronger OOC games to drive up their TV revenues.
Big12 goofed by not making Oklahoma-Nebraska an annual game.
Big12 also was kind of hurt by having some of the weaker programs (fanbase wise) getting successful and having some of the stronger programs (fanbase wise) struggling. Nebraska, Texas A&M, Texas, and some of the programs with big fanbases were just not doing well in Football while the smaller schools like Baylor, Kansas State, Iowa State, etc. were winning. That just made the Bigger programs want to leave more.
Nebraska and A&M left because of LHN. Instead of having a conference-wide network, Texas opted for having their own thing. That is what splintered the conference, for better or worse.
The Big 12 was always vulnerable to something like this because from its inception it was dominated by Texas and Oklahoma.