milohimself
RIP CITY
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48,891
- Likes
- 31
I saw the episode about the school where the teachers pack heat and they teach students how to defeat an attacker.
Overall I thought the whole thing was ridiculous. Selective editing and really a very outlier example (on both sides of the issue) to address the issue of protecting schools. It may be fun to watch but calling this journalism is a stretch.
Really? I thought it was a pretty unbiased view of them. I found it very interesting that he has been teaching them for years to be prepared. I didn't think they tried to make him look crazy or anything.
I do think the segments are too short to give a complete picture of any story though. It should really be at least 30 min on one subject.
The coverage of the school itself was relatively even (though I thought some of the footage showed the woman as incompetent with a firearm).
What I thought was ridiculous was that it was positioned to represent one side of the debate on should schools have armed protection. Clearly no one is suggesting that schools go to the extreme that this one, private school is doing.
They then had "experts" evaluate this school and no surprise those experts thought they were over the top.
If it was presented simply as what one school is doing then it would be fine. As it was presented (one side's solution for school protection) it was not informative.
It was akin to showing a hardcore free market, laissez fare capitalist school as what is taught in business school.