Wall Street Journal: USC is America's No. 1 team for Bowl TV ratings

#1

SEC Nightmare

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2010
Messages
461
Likes
0
#1
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204527804576043870683872488.html?mod=wsj_share_twitter

Which Teams Rule the Bowl Ratings?

—Darren Everson

When Southern California is in a bowl game, TV viewers tune in. Same goes for Florida State, Miami, Notre Dame and most teams in the Big Ten. Nebraska and Oklahoma surprisingly don't move the needle, though. And a few big-name schools—including LSU, Clemson and Georgia Tech—actually move it in the wrong direction.

To figure out which teams are the most popular TV draws during the bowl season, we looked at the national viewership figures for every bowl since 1998. We then ranked each school based on whether it exceeded or fell short of its bowls' average audience size. We only looked at major-conference schools (plus Notre Dame) that have played in at least six bowls. As one might expect, the big names did well. The best was USC, which exceeded its expected audience size by 29%. The most famous example of this was its epic national-title loss to Texas in 2006, which drew 35.6 million viewers—33% more than what the title game has averaged since its inception. Notre Dame (+21%) also fared well. The Fighting Irish's last bowl game, the 2008 Hawaii Bowl, drew a whopping 42% more viewers than usual.

Not so popular, surprisingly, was LSU (-9%). The Tigers have an rabid fan base, yet the national viewership figures for LSU's four major-bowl appearances were all below par. Nebraska's effect on viewership has been flat, while former Big Eight rival Oklahoma's impact has been slightly negative (-3%). But that's nothing compared to Virginia (-18%) and NC State (-17%).
 
Last edited:
#2
#2
That's really interesting. I'm not surprised that USC brings in good ratings, as they have a large fanbase and they draw the interest of the college football world.

It's crazy that LSU is so uninteresting.
 
#3
#3
which bowls the teams are playing in and the previous games' match ups should be factored in. some of these teams could have generated larger ratings simply because their bowl game happened to have more national appeal for unattached fans across the country vs the previous or general years.
 
#4
#4
It's 90s Notre Dame syndrome - you either love them or you hate them. If you like them, you'll tune in to watch because you want them to win. If you hate them, you'll watch because you want to see them lose.
 
#10
#10
The article doesn't say BCS bowls. We have been at more than six bowls since 1998. The article only listed the Top 5 and Bottom 5. UT made neither list.
 
#11
#11
Why does the OP list Tennessee as his favorite team? He is clearly a troll USC fan based on his post history. Not to mention his favorite teams are the Lakers and Raiders.

He only posts if it's about USC. Just throwing that out there for those who don't know.
 
#12
#12
Why does the OP list Tennessee as his favorite team? He is clearly a troll USC fan based on his post history. Not to mention his favorite teams are the Lakers and Raiders.

He only posts if it's about USC. Just throwing that out there for those who don't know.

Too obvious...And who name's themselves "SEC Nightmare"?...He needs to go back to his own boring board.
 
#15
#15
I thought you were talking about South Carolina. Speaking of USC, why are they not in the Sugar bowl. They are the runner up SEC champs. Since the SEC Champs(Auburn) are going to the NCG, then why isn't the runner up going to the Sugar Bowl, instead of Arkansas?
 
#16
#16
Why did KU get a BCS bowl game after MU clubbed them in 08? Yes still butt hurt.
 
#17
#17
I'm actualy surprised by the USC fact. Yes they have been the class of college football for the past several years but being on the West Coast I don't see them having a huge following outside of the West Coast and thier alums. I can the Big 10 schools,Florida,Texas and SEC schools like us and Georgia having a good tv rating. I'm surprised Nebraska isn't high on the list. They have a huge fan base!
 
#18
#18
The 2005 national championship helped that, and the rest is pretty simple: Reggie bush and Matt Leinart were must-see football every Saturday.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#19
#19
I thought you were talking about South Carolina. Speaking of USC, why are they not in the Sugar bowl. They are the runner up SEC champs. Since the SEC Champs(Auburn) are going to the NCG, then why isn't the runner up going to the Sugar Bowl, instead of Arkansas?

It is the same reason UT wasn't in the Sugar Bowl after the 2007 season. They aren't really BCS material and there is no obligation to take the loser of the conference championship game.
 
#20
#20
So this is based on exceeding expected audience size? Who "projects" expected audience size? Exactly what are the factors used to determine these expectations? Sounds kinda skewed to me........

The article clearly says it is using the average audience size as the measure against the team's viewership. It seems pretty simple to me.
 
#21
#21
The article clearly says it is using the average audience size as the measure against the team's viewership. It seems pretty simple to me.

Doesn't account for MANY different variables...Not simple at all......
 
#22
#22
Doesn't account for MANY different variables...Not simple at all......

I never saw anything in the article trying to portray that this was an excercise in scientific precision, but it is a VERY SIMPLE premise that if a particular team posts a higher viewership in the bowl game it participates in versus the average viewship of that bowl game over the period of time, it is likely due to the team in the game. You can throw in other variables as to day of week, competition in the game, or competition on other channels, etc., but the numbers are what they are, especially over several games.
 

VN Store



Back
Top