Rickyvol77
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Messages
- 16,786
- Likes
- 21,567
Great, then I expect each and every one of you to post here approving of the economic crippling of the United States since we bear the responsibility for allowing Biden into office.Ukraine can't surrender.
Comparing economic sanctions to targeting and killing civilians is ludicrous. It's not hypocritical to support sanctions against Russia, the citizens of Russia have allowed Putin and his merry band of gangsters to remain in power so they bear responsibility.
Because I'm sitting here watching washed up old clowns like yourself and the majority of our government crap away any financial stability that will be present for myself or my future children over blown-up pandemics, wars we don't belong in in any way, spending on idiocy, hyped-up news media ********, and wholesale acceptance of ****ing tweets minutes after talking about how twitter is irrelevant for news. You wonder why I'm mad? Because I am watching hypocrites, again like yourself, pretend to blast the government and the corporatocracy then willingly turn around, suck up their propaganda, and favor involvement in a conflict that has nothing to do with the United States. And then you come in here and give the old "RuSsIaNs CaN't EaT mCdOnAlD's" argument, which you know is an outright lie.
Come on.
I don't know why you're not taking the neo-nazi problem in Ukraine seriously. Yes, there are only 900 members in Azov BN; but there are literally dozens of these armed militias. There are also major political parties. I guess now they're rebranded as ultra-nationalists, but we didn't have a problem calling them out as neo-nazis before.
Commentary: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem
Azov fighters are Ukraine's greatest weapon and may be its greatest threat
Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
Is the US backing neo-Nazis in Ukraine?
How Many Neo-Nazis Is the U.S. Backing in Ukraine?
The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda
Svoboda: The rise of Ukraine's ultra-nationalists
Ukraine's threat from within
I particularly chuckled at this section from the last article
"One of Svoboda's leading members, sports journalist Ihor Miroshnychenko, his ponytail flying behind him, then charged the podium to prevent a deputy speaking in Russian. (Svoboda believes that only Ukrainian should be used in all official bodies.)
Outside, Svoboda deputies used a chainsaw to cut down an iron fence erected last year to prevent crowds from storming the parliament building. This they justified in the name of popular democracy.
"No other democratic country has fenced-off the national parliament," said Svoboda's Ruslan Koshulinskiy, the deputy speaker of parliament. "People have chosen these lawmakers and should have a right to have access to them."
It's not that simple. The last thing we want is any of those countries sending troops in.Color me unworried by the global threat of a Russian military that apparently abandons its functional fighting equipment all over the place mid-invasion. Europe is welcome to, and should be, leading the effort in Ukraine. If France and Germany wish to send soldiers into Ukraine to fight, more power to them. If they want to continue to escalate arms, or enforce a no-fly zone, then more power to them. The US's job is not to lead a regional conflict thousands of miles away, just like it wasn't our job to invade Iraq or provide arms to terrorists in Syria.
According to @hog88, your generation marked the start of the decline of this country, therefore you too bear responsibility for it. Your solution is to throw money down a toilet in a regional conflict, as if money and arms are free. You'll be dead before the impact of your generation fully comes to bear on my generation. What do you care if you support the creation of a worse world than you inherited?Yea, I really ate up the pandemic. I literally changed nothing about my habits for it. Try again.
I don’t use Twitter, Facebook, Tik Tok, or watch TV news. I read VN and the WSJ. So not sure what I am eating up from the media.
Don’t feel like a hypocrite in any manner. Private companies are free to do business or not do business wherever they choose.
I’ll happily wait for your solutions.
It is that simple. I've yet to see a reason why America should be involved other than the "Russia is a threat to the west". Russia is clearly not a threat to the United States. Who is it a threat to? Who should be dealing with it first? America leaping in in any form is foolish. And unfortunately, we're already deploying American soldiers to the region.It's not that simple. The last thing we want is any of those countries sending troops in.
I don't know why you're not taking the neo-nazi problem in Ukraine seriously. Yes, there are only 900 members in Azov BN; but there are literally dozens of these armed militias. There are also major political parties. I guess now they're rebranded as ultra-nationalists, but we didn't have a problem calling them out as neo-nazis before.
Commentary: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem
Azov fighters are Ukraine's greatest weapon and may be its greatest threat
Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
Is the US backing neo-Nazis in Ukraine?
How Many Neo-Nazis Is the U.S. Backing in Ukraine?
The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda
Svoboda: The rise of Ukraine's ultra-nationalists
Ukraine's threat from within
I particularly chuckled at this section from the last article
"One of Svoboda's leading members, sports journalist Ihor Miroshnychenko, his ponytail flying behind him, then charged the podium to prevent a deputy speaking in Russian. (Svoboda believes that only Ukrainian should be used in all official bodies.)
Outside, Svoboda deputies used a chainsaw to cut down an iron fence erected last year to prevent crowds from storming the parliament building. This they justified in the name of popular democracy.
"No other democratic country has fenced-off the national parliament," said Svoboda's Ruslan Koshulinskiy, the deputy speaker of parliament. "People have chosen these lawmakers and should have a right to have access to them."
According to @hog88, your generation marked the start of the decline of this country, therefore you too bear responsibility for it. Your solution is to throw money down a toilet in a regional conflict, as if money and arms are free. You'll be dead before the impact of your generation fully comes to bear on my generation. What do you care if you support the creation of a worse world than you inherited?
This statement alone proves your last sentence is absolute ********. Any dollars we spend fruitlessly are always relevant, because unless you start curtailing somewhere (and idiotic American military involvement and presence in nearly a hundred countries around the world is a nice place to start) you won't curtail anywhere. You are selling your kids down the **** river.What is my generation?
I’ve never stated an outright opinion on what we should do, that said, any dollars we spend on Ukraine is irrelevant in the grand scheme of our fiscal irresponsibility. That horse was out of the barn long ago.
I have teenage kids, I care.
We are involved in Europe because of history. The last time we took that approach it didn't go so well and we ended up having to be involved anyway. We are involved in NATO as a deterrent. If America can't be trusted to abide by obligations then the dollar is no longer propped up and we lose the comfy way of life we've grown accustomed to.It is that simple. I've yet to see a reason why America should be involved other than the "Russia is a threat to the west". Russia is clearly not a threat to the United States. Who is it a threat to? Who should be dealing with it first? America leaping in in any form is foolish. And unfortunately, we're already deploying American soldiers to the region.
And who is eating the bulk of the cost of this "beefing up"? At some point Europe has to do its part, and if they won't do it in a conflict situation maybe they deserve their own fall. American taxpayers are the victims here and that's inarguable.We are involved in Europe because of history. The last time we took that approach it didn't go so well and we ended up having to be involved anyway. We are involved in NATO as a deterrent. If America can't be trusted to abide by obligations then the dollar is no longer propped up and we lose the comfy way of life we've grown accustomed to.
My point is the world is intertwined. It's but as simple as America not being involved. As for tried being involved in but sure anywhere here is advocating for it. NATO, of which we are a member, is beefing up it's defenses as a deterrent in light of Russia military aggression.
This statement alone proves your last sentence is absolute ********. Any dollars we spend fruitlessly are always relevant, because unless you start curtailing somewhere (and idiotic American military involvement and presence in nearly a hundred countries around the world is a nice place to start) you won't curtail anywhere. You are selling your kids down the **** river.
According to @hog88, your generation marked the start of the decline of this country, therefore you too bear responsibility for it. Your solution is to throw money down a toilet in a regional conflict, as if money and arms are free. You'll be dead before the impact of your generation fully comes to bear on my generation. What do you care if you support the creation of a worse world than you inherited?
This is child like naivety.
I bet you lie awake at night worrying about Illinois Nazis as well, right?