Both very short with similar builds and running motions too lolI think a lot of people understandably confuse Pat Adams and Chuck Jones. View attachment 621498View attachment 621499
Wow! That's too bad for Chuck Jones. I honestly thought that was Pat Adams out there last night.I think a lot of people understandably confuse Pat Adams and Chuck Jones. View attachment 621498View attachment 621499
Little man syndrome. Both were most likely bullied on playgrounds as kids so now they're venting in the only way they can.I think a lot of people understandably confuse Pat Adams and Chuck Jones. View attachment 621498View attachment 621499
Pat Adams shirt should have blue and white stripes.I think a lot of people understandably confuse Pat Adams and Chuck Jones. View attachment 621498View attachment 621499
Do you realize “being bullied” means we were being intimidated by inappropriate physical contact. I didn’t see our team shy away and cower from Mizzou’s style of play.I don't think I have ever seen a team try to bump the offensive player off the ball and not be called. I think we were in bonus in both halves with 9 mins left. So while they were calling fouls. They missed a ton of calls in the first half. It definitely caused us issues in the first half. I guess if you are MO you do whatever you can to try to derail a team like UT. It did work to rattle our guys in the first half. Although honestly they should have had 3-4 kids foul out had it been called correctly. TN is a physical team and they were being bullied by hard uncalled contact.
Yes I 100% do. Their play in the first half caused our guys issues. They were playing in our guys pockets, with hard non called fouls causing poor shot selection. I am not saying that our guys shy'd away from this play. We just did not hit shots we normally hit without the frustration on the non calls.Do you realize “being bullied” means we were being intimidated by inappropriate physical contact. I didn’t see our team shy away and cower from Mizzou’s style of play.
By this statement you are saying our typical play was disrupted by their highly physical style of play, not bullied by them. Bullied is a strong word and I don’t ever see anybody bullying Awaka and most of our players.Yes I 100% do. Their play in the first half caused our guys issues. They were playing in our guys pockets, with hard non called fouls causing poor shot selection. I am not saying that our guys shy'd away from this play. We just did not hit shots we normally hit without the frustration on the non calls.
They did what other teams that we've struggled against have done. They don't sit back and let us make the first move. They get out and guard us 35' from the basket and expose our lack of guys who can break their man down off the dribble. We have one player who can do that, and he's 5'-9".Yes I 100% do. Their play in the first half caused our guys issues. They were playing in our guys pockets, with hard non called fouls causing poor shot selection. I am not saying that our guys shy'd away from this play. We just did not hit shots we normally hit without the frustration on the non calls.
I know that's true.. I yelled so hard at the TV last night that I scared my dog, and he's a 100 lb. German Shepherd. He wouldn't come back around until the TV was turned off.Whatever officiating crew it was, they stunk. Knecht and others get mugged and no call. Later, they call a touch foul. Either call it close, or let them play and ignore most contact. But for pity's sake, call it consistently.
I guarantee if you ask Barnes if they bullied our guards in the first half and he would agree. They did it because they were allowed to with hard contact. As stated our guys did not shy away. Although the lack of calls on the hard contact sure caused us issues. Good Lord , maybe we can argue about the sky being blue next.By this statement you are saying our typical play was disrupted by their highly physical style of play, not bullied by them. Bullied is a strong word and I don’t ever see anybody bullying Awaka and most of our players.