Watching the 93 IU v. Michigan Game

[hatvol96]

One thing occurs to me, both of those teams would be totally dominant in college basketball today.

 

[tvolsfan]

Was that the 2nd year of the Fab Five?

 

[hatvol96]

Was that the 2nd year of the Fab Five?

Yes. IU beat them twice by one point that year.

 

[tvolsfan]

I would have been great if they could have pulled it out one year... You don't see groups like that often.

 

[OrangeEmpire]

Cheaney was an animal, to bad he never panned out in the N.B.A.

 

[hatvol96]

Cheaney was an animal, to bad he never panned out in the N.B.A.

It depends on how you define panning out. He played in the League for over a decade and was generally a double digit scorer.

 

[OrangeEmpire]

It depends on how you define panning out. He played in the League for over a decade and was generally a double digit scorer.

Come on, he was one of the most dominating players in the country.

You had to expect more out of him in the pro's.

 

[hatvol96]

Come on, he was one of the most dominating players in the country.

You had to expect more out of him in the pro's.

Not really. As a Bob Knight fanatic, I probably watched at least eighty percent of the games Calbert played in college. His game was perfect for the motion offense. However, he lacked the explosiveness to be a dominant pro.

 

[doozer]

to this day, i still can not beleive either the 93 or 94 IU basketball teams did not win a National Championship.

an Alan Henderson injury stands between Knight and another title.

 

[OrangeEmpire]

Not really. As a Bob Knight fanatic, I probably watched at least eighty percent of the games Calbert played in college. His game was perfect for the motion offense. However, he lacked the explosiveness to be a dominant pro.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

I thought he would at least be good for 18 a night.....