we were supposed to be unstoppable except pass d

[tvolsfan]

if we got pass d fixed, we were ssupposed to be unstoppable.

our pass defnese IS fixed.

in the last 5 games we havent ALLOWED ONE PASS TOUCHDOWN. we are 2-3 in those games. that wasnt the problem.

lucas taylor may be the special teams returner we need.

what im wondering is

WHAT HAPPENED TO OUR STAR STUDDED OFFENSE. PLAY THE SCOUT TEAM OR SOMETHING.

 

[smokedog#3]

it's real simple you have a qb that can't throw the ball 30 yards there for your wide recievers are not an option. you can't run the ball because you can't throw the ball, the safties cheated up and that amounts to 1 or 2 yards a carry. throw in the coaching staff sorry play book and you get a 3-3 team after 6 games a 6-5 team at the end of the season.

 

[tvolsfan]

ainge better start the next game. clausen lead us to three yards of offense.

 

[smokedog#3]

never going to happen clausen will start the rest of the games in hopes that phil can grab little brother jimmy from the clausen family. he's already thrown our sesaon away anyway what does it matter.

 

[duckman398686]

its because of sanders. sign the petition

 

[tvolsfan]

JIMMY. WHO CARES ABOUT THAT RIGHT NOW.

we have crompton and at tennn we will get a good recruit. the struggles arent worth a jimmy clasuen who said he wont even come here w/ randy sanders.

 

[swami2302]

If we want Jimmy then we'd better get rid of Sanders. I think a new exciting OC could be what we need to land Jimmy or maybe another top QB in a year or two. I think with Sanders around top QB's will look elsewhere.

 

[dvolsfan]

Originally posted by tvolsfan@Oct 22, 2005 7:26 PM
JIMMY. WHO CARES ABOUT THAT RIGHT NOW.

we have crompton and at tennn we will get a good recruit. the struggles arent worth a jimmy clasuen who said he wont even come here w/ randy sanders.

[snapback]171308[/snapback]​

Could someone exlpain why Coach Fulmer is gung ho about the Clausen's. It seems to me they are very over rated.

 

[smokedog#3]

why else would fullmer put a guy at qb that can't throw the ball more than 30 yards. i have no other explanation. he's not good. i can't figure it out. this season is over might as well face it and start looking at next year. after this heart crushing defeat we will be lucky to finish 6-5. why should the defense continue to fight when you know your not going to score.

 

[tvolsfan]

fulmer ismore concerned about the great recruiter title then the sec title it seems to me.

the sad thing is, we wont be able to hold notre dame to 6 pts either. i know our d is good but nd will still put up around 24 pts. if we win that, we need offense.

 

[#10_Ainge_#10]

Originally posted by tvolsfan@Oct 22, 2005 6:16 PM
ainge better start the next game. clausen lead us to three yards of offense.

[snapback]171256[/snapback]​

Are you kidding me? Ainge threw 2 passes the whole game...Over shot his one receiver in the flat and then threw one right into about 4 Crimson shirts at the end of the game....Ainge start next weekend? Yea, right...He might as well get used to riding the pine cuz Crompton will be our man next year

 

[smokedog#3]

ainge is our only shot against south carolina, ND, vandy. clausen should be able to beaat kentucky, but i'm not sure. i stated on this post that unless ainge played a majority of the downs we would score 0 points and lose. so we scored 3 more than i thought. if clausen plays the whole game against notre dame we will put up agoose egg 000000000000000000000

 

[VolsWinRLose]

Originally posted by smokedog#3@Oct 22, 2005 5:36 PM
why else would fullmer put a guy at qb that can't throw the ball more than 30 yards.  i have no other explanation.  he's not good.  i can't figure it out.  this season is over might as well face it and start looking at next year.  after this heart crushing defeat we will be lucky to finish 6-5.  why should the defense continue to fight when you know your not going to score.

[snapback]171361[/snapback]​

This loss wasn't Clausen's fault. I don't care what anybody says; it was not his fault. He might not be that great, but he's better than the alternative.

 

[tvolsfan]

nd has bad d. we will put up 17. the problem is, they have maybe the only offense we cant hold to 10 points. nd scores 20 min i htate to say it.

 

[Lexvol]

Originally posted by VolsWinRLose@Oct 22, 2005 6:52 PM
This loss wasn't Clausen's fault. I don't care what anybody says; it was not his fault. He might not be that great, but he's better than the alternative.

[snapback]171438[/snapback]​

When he stepped over the line of scrimmage, TE was Wide Open in the endzone.

UT runs a verticle offense, and he doesn't have the talent to do it. I don't think anybody cares what you say either by the way.