Other_Guy
foolishFool
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 12,268
- Likes
- 13,564
The 1st fumble could've been on the lineman and RB as well as Pete.
Sack fumble happens all the time. QBs hold onto the ball all of the time. In practice, I'm sure the OL blocks very well and he had too much faith in them. Sure it was a bad spot, but I don't jump ship I pull him aside and preach quick throws.
1st pick is inexcusable for sure, but 1st 2 TOs could've happened to Worley against a great defense.
So Jones took a shot with Pete like everyone wanted yet all I see is Pete should've been pulled after the SECOND fumble. You do realize they had FIVE total plays. How can you decide if Pete can make plays Worley can't (complete a dang pass) in freaking 5 plays?
So should he have been pulled after the 1st pick? Probably. Yet I think CBJ looked and saw what I did after on the fumbles and gave him one more chance. I think we should have settled on a FG but all of the negavols would have posted "playing not to lose it's Florida go for it" like they did against Oregon.
Sack fumble happens all the time. QBs hold onto the ball all of the time. In practice, I'm sure the OL blocks very well and he had too much faith in them. Sure it was a bad spot, but I don't jump ship I pull him aside and preach quick throws.
1st pick is inexcusable for sure, but 1st 2 TOs could've happened to Worley against a great defense.
So Jones took a shot with Pete like everyone wanted yet all I see is Pete should've been pulled after the SECOND fumble. You do realize they had FIVE total plays. How can you decide if Pete can make plays Worley can't (complete a dang pass) in freaking 5 plays?
So should he have been pulled after the 1st pick? Probably. Yet I think CBJ looked and saw what I did after on the fumbles and gave him one more chance. I think we should have settled on a FG but all of the negavols would have posted "playing not to lose it's Florida go for it" like they did against Oregon.
Last edited: