Where can I watch a replay of the O&W game?

#4
#4
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#5
#5
The Dish Network Orange & White Game...unavailable to watch in its entirety anywhere. So classic UT in its bureaucracy.
 
#6
#6
dont think there is one man.. more ridiculous then the Brits wearing red coats into battle, IMO

Brits wore red coats because they were usd to fighting on European battlefields where they lined up in tight formations and essentially walked towards each other firing until one side broke. In such types of formations it didn't matter if you wore loud colors or camouflage because the 2sides were lined up on an open plain. It only mattered to the commanders lined up behind the formations so they could tell where their formations were in all the smoke from th musket fire and cannonades. The problems with the bright red only became (painfully) obvious in America in areas where the Americans conducted guerilla warfare in more wooded terrain, where the red stood out and made excellent targets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7
#7
The Dish Network Orange & White Game...unavailable to watch in its entirety anywhere. So classic UT in its bureaucracy.

Blame ESPN, not Tennessee. They possessed the right to broadcast and didn't take advantage of it. They didn't relinquish that right even though they didn't take advantage of it, so UT's hands are legally tied.

That's my understanding at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8
#8
Blame ESPN, not Tennessee. They possessed the right to broadcast and didn't take advantage of it. They didn't relinquish that right even though they didn't take advantage of it, so UT's hands are legally tied.

That's my understanding at least.

So espn really does hate us!!! :boredom:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#10
#10
Blame ESPN, not Tennessee. They possessed the right to broadcast and didn't take advantage of it. They didn't relinquish that right even though they didn't take advantage of it, so UT's hands are legally tied.

That's my understanding at least.

You could be right, but you would think that the event that drew 70k fans would generate enough interest to telecast. Puzzling for sure.
 
#11
#11
Brits wore red coats because they were usd to fighting on European battlefields where they lined up in tight formations and essentially walked towards each other firing until one side broke. In such types of formations it didn't matter if you wore loud colors or camouflage because the 2sides were lined up on an open plain. It only mattered to the commanders lined up behind the formations so they could tell where their formations were in all the smoke from th musket fire and cannonades. The problems with the bright red only became (painfully) obvious in America in areas where the Americans conducted guerilla warfare in more wooded terrain, where the red stood out and made excellent targets.

:clap:
 
#12
#12
ESPN or Sportsouth usually reruns it. I haven't seen anyone listed except the few they showed live like Clem & son & FSU. I guess ESPN has the SECs soul so they are going after the ACCs now
 
#13
#13
Isn't it odd that we have highlights but not a full film? I mean someone filmed it and edited the video to get the highlights so where is the full video?

Been making this argument for a while now. We need a hacker here on VN who can hack into the UT database and find it.
 
#14
#14
I don't understand why utsports.com don't sell it on their website. It would sell pretty quick since it wasn't televized.

Go Vols!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
Brits wore red coats because they were usd to fighting on European battlefields where they lined up in tight formations and essentially walked towards each other firing until one side broke. In such types of formations it didn't matter if you wore loud colors or camouflage because the 2sides were lined up on an open plain. It only mattered to the commanders lined up behind the formations so they could tell where their formations were in all the smoke from th musket fire and cannonades. The problems with the bright red only became (painfully) obvious in America in areas where the Americans conducted guerilla warfare in more wooded terrain, where the red stood out and made excellent targets.

Please tell me there isn't going to be a quiz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#16
#16
Brits wore red coats because they were usd to fighting on European battlefields where they lined up in tight formations and essentially walked towards each other firing until one side broke. In such types of formations it didn't matter if you wore loud colors or camouflage because the 2sides were lined up on an open plain. It only mattered to the commanders lined up behind the formations so they could tell where their formations were in all the smoke from th musket fire and cannonades. The problems with the bright red only became (painfully) obvious in America in areas where the Americans conducted guerilla warfare in more wooded terrain, where the red stood out and made excellent targets.

I saw The Patriot once too lol jk :p
 
#17
#17
Brits wore red coats because they were usd to fighting on European battlefields where they lined up in tight formations and essentially walked towards each other firing until one side broke. In such types of formations it didn't matter if you wore loud colors or camouflage because the 2sides were lined up on an open plain. It only mattered to the commanders lined up behind the formations so they could tell where their formations were in all the smoke from th musket fire and cannonades. The problems with the bright red only became (painfully) obvious in America in areas where the Americans conducted guerilla warfare in more wooded terrain, where the red stood out and made excellent targets.


brits.. :no:
 
#19
#19
Blame ESPN, not Tennessee. They possessed the right to broadcast and didn't take advantage of it. They didn't relinquish that right even though they didn't take advantage of it, so UT's hands are legally tied.

That's my understanding at least.

Another contract not well thought out eh? Is this Hart? or SEC?
 
#20
#20
Brits wore red coats because they were usd to fighting on European battlefields where they lined up in tight formations and essentially walked towards each other firing until one side broke. In such types of formations it didn't matter if you wore loud colors or camouflage because the 2sides were lined up on an open plain. It only mattered to the commanders lined up behind the formations so they could tell where their formations were in all the smoke from th musket fire and cannonades. The problems with the bright red only became (painfully) obvious in America in areas where the Americans conducted guerilla warfare in more wooded terrain, where the red stood out and made excellent targets.

the_more_you_know2.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#21
#21
Blame ESPN, not Tennessee. They possessed the right to broadcast and didn't take advantage of it. They didn't relinquish that right even though they didn't take advantage of it, so UT's hands are legally tied.

That's my understanding at least.
UT has been taping their own version of games for replay for years, whether they were broadcast by another network or not. I don't see why this would be any different.
 
#22
#22
Brits wore red coats because they were usd to fighting on European battlefields where they lined up in tight formations and essentially walked towards each other firing until one side broke. In such types of formations it didn't matter if you wore loud colors or camouflage because the 2sides were lined up on an open plain. It only mattered to the commanders lined up behind the formations so they could tell where their formations were in all the smoke from th musket fire and cannonades. The problems with the bright red only became (painfully) obvious in America in areas where the Americans conducted guerilla warfare in more wooded terrain, where the red stood out and made excellent targets.

nerd.
 

VN Store



Back
Top