In 2004, we recruited a Pro-Style QB and a Dual-threat, why you ask?
Because we had an understanding that the non-mobile QB was a problem if we did not have an excellent line and a stout running game. Have we had them in games, YES; have we had them in Seasons, NO.
We had a championship formula that is quite characteristic for most of the National Championships the last few years.....
Take a look at the last 5 years of National Champs and see where we lack in their understanding of the changing nature of CFB.
2002- Ohio State
2003- LSU or USC (depends on whom you ask)
2004- USC
2005- Texas
2006- Florida
2007- LSU
What is the common features of all these teams?
Dual Threat QB? Yes, (now you can say USC did not have a dual-threat qb, you would be correct but until we can match talent with USC, we will compare to our counterparts)
LSU 2003 - actually not only did Mauck run some, but they had Marcus Randel whom was a change of pace.
Texas 2005 - Vince Young
Florida 2006 - Tebow
LSU 2007 - Perriloux
Does any see a pattern and why we should have been crushed when we did not secure a commitment from a Robert Griffith type last year, and no this was not a long post to get RG, it is more about getting up to date with the speed of the SEC.....
UT NEEDS a Dual threat QB and not a small sized one that gets destroyed the first time he runs or can't handle the pressure of the SEC (see BS in 2004)
We are in a similar situation as Joe Gibbs coming back to the NFL and trying the rushing first offense.....
Obviously there are triple option teams, other teams run the wing-t or something similar, but they are not contending every year for a NC. ( and yes, neither are we)
Because we had an understanding that the non-mobile QB was a problem if we did not have an excellent line and a stout running game. Have we had them in games, YES; have we had them in Seasons, NO.
We had a championship formula that is quite characteristic for most of the National Championships the last few years.....
Take a look at the last 5 years of National Champs and see where we lack in their understanding of the changing nature of CFB.
2002- Ohio State
2003- LSU or USC (depends on whom you ask)
2004- USC
2005- Texas
2006- Florida
2007- LSU
What is the common features of all these teams?
Dual Threat QB? Yes, (now you can say USC did not have a dual-threat qb, you would be correct but until we can match talent with USC, we will compare to our counterparts)
LSU 2003 - actually not only did Mauck run some, but they had Marcus Randel whom was a change of pace.
Texas 2005 - Vince Young
Florida 2006 - Tebow
LSU 2007 - Perriloux
Does any see a pattern and why we should have been crushed when we did not secure a commitment from a Robert Griffith type last year, and no this was not a long post to get RG, it is more about getting up to date with the speed of the SEC.....
UT NEEDS a Dual threat QB and not a small sized one that gets destroyed the first time he runs or can't handle the pressure of the SEC (see BS in 2004)
We are in a similar situation as Joe Gibbs coming back to the NFL and trying the rushing first offense.....
Obviously there are triple option teams, other teams run the wing-t or something similar, but they are not contending every year for a NC. ( and yes, neither are we)