Who was behind the Gov. Palin torpedo job??

#1

gsvol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
14,179
Likes
10
#1
You'd never guess.

Obama’s then campaign chief of staff, now White House advisor, Pete Rouse, is an Alaskan. He is also great friends with former Alaska State Senator Kim Elton.

I suppose everyone knows why Elton is an ex-senator??

Those two go way back having worked together on a former Alaska Lt Governor’s staff. Rouse still votes absentee in Alaska.

Everyone has heard of "Troopergate" the phony investigation, really a witch hunt, cooked up by the Alaska democrat/communist party with the help of Barack Obama.

At the time CNN and others reported that Obama had been in talks with the troopers union over this. But no one seemed to care enough to stay on that story. Too busy dealing with thrills up their legs I guess.

What happened next was a conspiracy to try and harm Sarah Palin. Their hope was impeachment.

Of course, they failed, but just days before the November presidential election, Senator Kim Elton, who was ramrodding this deal, promised that Sarah Palin was going down.

In the end, Sarah Palin was cleared from any wrong doing after the state personnel board reviewed the bogus Branchflower report cooked up by Steven Branchflower and Kim Elton.

They slammed Branchflower’s investigation and declared Palin completely innocent.

But, the damage was done, and in pure Chicago pay-for-play thug politics, Barack Obama, upon taking office, gave Kim Elton a make work job in the Department of Interior.

"Barack Obama has ties to Alaskan’s For Truth as well as the Wasilla Project and Mythbusters. And with his man Pete Rouse’s lifelong ties to Alaska, it’s just not much of a leap to understand this deliberate and coordinated effort to destroy Sarah Palin all leads to an office somewhere at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C.

Case in point. Remember a week or so ago when it was illegally leaked that Sarah Palin’s Alaska Trust Fund, her legal defense fund was itself illegal?

This is typical for the Alaska Mafia. They have filed over 20 bogus ethics complains, cost the state of Alaska at minimum $2 million tax payer dollars, basically stealing $2 mil, as well as cost Sarah herself over a half million personally. So what did they do? They filed an idiotic ethics complaint saying, basically, she didn’t have a right to raise money to defend herself!"

Everyone knows who are behind the attacks against Sarah Palin. These people, are PAID by Obama, Soros, Axelrod, and Emmanuel.

This is typical Chicago style politics. Obama has been running for re-election since November 4th, he sees Sarah as a HUGE threat that must be taken out
 
#3
#3
the Saul Alinsky method.

camp%20obama.jpg


Here it is, the liberals guide for political warfare as developed by Saul Alinsky. Read them , learn them and apply them daily. Beat the socialist with their own game!

Rules for radicals; (with comments)

RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood.

(These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)


RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.

(Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)


RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

(This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)


RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

(This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)


RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

(Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)


RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

(Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)


RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news.

(Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)


RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

(Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)


RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

(Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign."

(Keep the public discussion focused on socialist talking points.)

RULE 11: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.

(Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)


RULE 12: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem.

(Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)


RULE 13: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

(This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works, character assassination is a very effective tool.)

Has anyone read this book?:

6a00d8341c2f0553ef01053699b447970b-800wi
 
#4
#4
Yeah, Sarah "tuck my tail and run" Palin is a huge threat on the political landscape.

She was washed up after being exposed as a complete nimrod during the POTUS election.

Surely the GOP can get a better threat than that. Surely they can find a competent person in the party. If not, welcome back Barry.
 
#5
#5
Yeah, Sarah "tuck my tail and run" Palin is a huge threat on the political landscape.

She was washed up after being exposed as a complete nimrod during the POTUS election.

Surely the GOP can get a better threat than that. Surely they can find a competent person in the party. If not, welcome back Barry.

if she's now such a non-threat, why is all the vitriol continuing to be directed at her? Hell, even Bush Derangement Syndrome is fading, not even Obama blaming Bush at every staged press event can't keep it alive.
 
#6
#6
if she's now such a non-threat, why is all the vitriol continuing to be directed at her? Hell, even Bush Derangement Syndrome is fading, not even Obama blaming Bush at every staged press event can't keep it alive.

Honestly, I don't see any political vitriol toward her. I think she's been irrelevant in the political world since McCain locked her in a room during their campaign. He took a big gamble on his selection, and while I liked it on the surface, it ended up being a big stinking turd.

She's been on the talk show humor circle for a while, but it's because she offers up so much easy material.
 
#8
#8
if she's now such a non-threat, why is all the vitriol continuing to be directed at her? Hell, even Bush Derangement Syndrome is fading, not even Obama blaming Bush at every staged press event can't keep it alive.


Attn '68:

Latest weather update;

If you get two airheads in perfect alignment, you may create a wind tunnel effect and if it should get out of hand, we could experience our first hurricane of the year and then they will be trying to blow smoke up your butt about global warming again.

It looks like cap and tax may die a quiet death, after the clunkernomics crash, maybe state run socialist health care will meet the same fate.

alexi.jpg


Who is this dorky looking dude in the red power tie??
 
#9
#9
Honestly, I don't see any political vitriol toward her. I think she's been irrelevant in the political world since McCain locked her in a room during their campaign. He took a big gamble on his selection, and while I liked it on the surface, it ended up being a big stinking turd.

She's been on the talk show humor circle for a while, but it's because she offers up so much easy material.

The MSM has been talking about her almost non-stop. That's a lot of coverage for someone who's such a non-threat.

She ended up being a turd but look at who she ran with. McCain may have been the worst RNC Presidential Candidate ever.
 
#11
#11
The MSM has been talking about her almost non-stop. That's a lot of coverage for someone who's such a non-threat.

She ended up being a turd but look at who she ran with. McCain may have been the worst RNC Presidential Candidate ever.

Don't forget Wendel Wilkie.

Sarah certainly isn't afraid at their crude attempts at character assassination.

Tuesday night she dined at 'Michaels' in NYC, the epicenter of liberal media gathering spots, sort of their holy church, if you will.

Talk about going into the lions den, word is that not one of the fobbish little snobs had the gonads to look her in the eye.
 
#12
#12
I would say her pregnant daughter.

A libtard is nothing if not self-righteous, of course if one of Barry and Michelle's daughters should get pregnant, they will get an abortion.

In the midst of your double plus good duck speak okla, do you understand the term 'non-sequiter?'
 
#13
#13
Yeah, Sarah "tuck my tail and run" Palin is a huge threat on the political landscape.

She was washed up after being exposed as a complete nimrod during the POTUS election.

Surely the GOP can get a better threat than that. Surely they can find a competent person in the party. If not, welcome back Barry.

you're pathetic UT. we have a nimrod in the office right now, but you sheep will vote for that guy come 2012.
 

VN Store



Back
Top