Why is this news? What am I missing?

#1

IBlvNTmWrk

Dawn of a New Day
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
9,205
Likes
4,657
#1
The article is positioned to make this a negative aspect of Bachmann's work history. After reading it... in some ways it makes me like her more. Appears she also has some fire in her belly.

NJ: A closer look at Bachmann's past - politics - Decision 2012 - msnbc.com

“In my work as a former federal tax attorney, I saw firsthand that our nation’s tax laws are hard to understand and undermine the country’s prosperity by imposing needlessly harsh penalties on work, savings, and investments.’’

Tell that to Marvin Manypenny, a Native American activist in Minnesota who failed to pay taxes on three years of wages totaling $30,650. Bachmann took him to federal court in 1992. Manypenny worked at the Youth Project, described in court records as “a public foundation with a 17-year history of building citizen participation organizations around the country committed to social justice and peace.’’ The resident of the White Earth Indian Reservation contended he was exempt from income taxes because of the April 8, 1867 land treaty between his Chippewa Indian ancestors and the U.S. government.

He met Bachmann briefly in the federal court building in St. Paul. “She was very—how do I put this?—haughty and curt,’’ the 64-year-old Manypenny told National Journal in a telephone interview. “I tried to state my contentions to her and it was like talking to a brick wall.’’

The court didn’t accept Manypenny’s argument, either. While the treaty exempted Indian-owned land from taxes, it did not exempt individuals. “We give no credence to petitioner’s contention that he and the land are one,’’ the court ruled.
 
#2
#2
This smacks of being a hit piece. It's comical the way the writer tries to build sympathy for what amounts to a tax cheat that owed $30,000 in back taxes as if he should be absolved of any responsibility because he has a noble profession.

. . . and then there's this "profound" point.
As she flexes her credentials as a Republican presidential candidate in a field of former governors and corporate executives, Bachmann is more likely to describe herself as a “former federal tax litigation attorney’’—as she did in her first nationally televised debate—than as a three-term member of Congress. But she rarely, if ever, mentions the one and only employer of her legal services: the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Uh, isn't it sort of understood that a "federal tax litigation attorney" would work for the Treasury Department?
 
Last edited:
#3
#3
This smacks of being a hit piece. It's comical the way the writer tries to build sympathy for what amounts to a tax cheat that owed $30,000 in back taxes as if he should be absolved of any responsibility because he has a noble profession.

. . . and then there's this "profound" point. Uh, isn't it sort of understood that a "federal tax litigation attorney" would work for the Treasury Department?

These guys are really reaching...
 
#4
#4
This smacks of being a hit piece. It's comical the way the writer tries to build sympathy for what amounts to a tax cheat that owed $30,000 in back taxes as if he should be absolved of any responsibility because he has a noble profession.

. . . and then there's this "profound" point. Uh, isn't it sort of understood that a "federal tax litigation attorney" would work for the Treasury Department?

Good point... surprised they didn't compare her to Roman tax collectors. Suppose instead they would prefer she take the path of Lady Godiva.

These guys are really reaching...

MSNBC... guess I shouldn't be too surprised.
 
#6
#6
This is an example of poor strategy, planning, and execution. Why even set out to write a hit piece on either Palin or Bachman? Simply wait until they open their mouths and then quote them verbatim.
 
#7
#7
This is an example of poor strategy, planning, and execution. Why even set out to write a hit piece on either Palin or Bachman? Simply wait until they open their mouths and then quote them verbatim.

You're just a libtard freakshow. Palin and Bachmann are geniuses.
 
#10
#10
#12
#12
What am I missing about Iowa? It doesn't seem like she would straight up dominate there.
it's the same thing that happened in '08 with Huckabee. Nobody other than Romney has any traction and there's a giant vacuum for an unapologetic social conservative.
 
#13
#13
What am I missing about Iowa? It doesn't seem like she would straight up dominate there.

It's all of these people from the podunk farm towns. I work with several social conservatives and it's like they keep popping up out of nowhere. Outside of Iowa City, everywhere else is socially conservative. The churches have a stranglehold on the people here.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#14
#14
Pawlenty blasts Bachmann's 'nonexistent' record - politics - Decision 2012 - msnbc.com

Pawlenty is going after her hard.

A lot of folks were not giving her a chance.
It now looks like she will do very well in Iowa and South Carolina and appears to be building momentum
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Pawlenty has no choice - he has to do well in Iowa or he's toast.

I agree. Just a shame that he backed down against attacking Romney during the debate, and now he decides to go after the only female in the group. Could backfire on him if he's not careful.

It's all of these people from the podunk farm towns. I work with several social conservatives and it's like they keep popping up out of nowhere. Outside of Iowa City, everywhere else is socially conservative. The churches have a stranglehold on the people here.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Your expressions of kindness toward those who may view things differently than you overwhelms me.
 
#15
#15
I agree that Bachmann cannot be criticized for this. In my work, I frequently see people like this who try to avoid income taxes with some sort of oddball sovereign nation approach. Some are like this fellow with the Native American angle. Most are wack-o folks who subscribe to these ultra anti-government theories and join up with the theories about how some treaty or Act back in 1795 means taxes are illegal. They declare themselves to be non-US citizens, what have you.

There is plenty to criticize Bachmann about. But not this.
 
#16
#16
I agree. Just a shame that he backed down against attacking Romney during the debate, and now he decides to go after the only female in the group. Could backfire on him if he's not careful.



Your expressions of kindness toward those who may view things differently than you overwhelms me.

It was wordy...but true. Their values mirror the church. I live in Midwest - Outside of large metropolises, values are heavily shaped by religion.
 
#17
#17
I agree. Just a shame that he backed down against attacking Romney during the debate, and now he decides to go after the only female in the group. Could backfire on him if he's not careful.



Your expressions of kindness toward those who may view things differently than you overwhelms me.

Eh, the core group he needs aren't the Romeny supporters, but the Bachmann supporters. Makes since why he would target them instead.
 
Last edited:
#18
#18
I agree that Bachmann cannot be criticized for this. In my work, I frequently see people like this who try to avoid income taxes with some sort of oddball sovereign nation approach. Some are like this fellow with the Native American angle. Most are wack-o folks who subscribe to these ultra anti-government theories and join up with the theories about how some treaty or Act back in 1795 means taxes are illegal. They declare themselves to be non-US citizens, what have you.

There is plenty to criticize Bachmann about. But not this.

Good post... caught me off guard. :)

Eh, the core group he needs aren't the Romeny supporters, but the Bachmann supporters. Makes since why he would target them instead.

I agree it's the Bachmann supporters that he needs, but my point was that he came off VERY weak when he was handed the opportunity to support his previous statements about Romney pre-debate and chose to say nothing during the debate. And now he comes out hard against the only female candidate currently in the running. To some, perhaps more so the female voters, it could come across as a little sexist that he wouldn't confront Romney and then takes on Bachmann. jmo.
 

VN Store



Back
Top