Will this article spark change in replay?

#2
#2
Gordon Riese is an idiot who should keep his mouth shut. He's just trying to cover himself now. The truth is, the PAC 10 was writing his checks. He kept his mouth shut because he didn't want to take away that pathetic league's only chance to have a team other than USC win a nonconference game of substance. It's a league with pathetic officiating in football and their hoops referees are even worse. Bob Stoops has the right idea. Just don't schedule teams from that lousy league and you won't have to worry about their incompetent officials.
 
#3
#3
I agree with their officiating 'quality' assessment absolutely. The Cal-USC game debacle on Cal's TD cemented that fact for me.

I just wonder if someone coming out after the fact and admitting the call was blown in the replay booth due to replay rules in place will spark a change in the rules (say, being able to overturn a call even though the whistle was blown, etc.), at the least.
 
#4
#4
HawaiiVol said:
I agree with their officiating 'quality' assessment absolutely. The Cal-USC game debacle on Cal's TD cemented that fact for me.

I just wonder if someone coming out after the fact and admitting the call was blown in the replay booth due to replay rules in place will spark a change in the rules (say, being able to overturn a call even though the whistle was blown, etc.), at the least.
Click to expand...
I don't see any way to change calls where the whistle has blown. The play ends with the whistle. There would be no fair way to handle making assumptions as to what would have happened without the whistle.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top