Will we have played against 3 #1 seeds?

#1

bigorange34232

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
250
Likes
123
#1
If things hold up and Kansas, Kentucky, and Purdue get 1 seeds that means he will have played 4 games against #1 seeds and hopefully we will have split (means we beat Kentucky saturday). But if not this still has to help our seeding. I think we got a shot at a 3 seed. If we win 3 of 4 and win 2 in SEC tourney I think we should get a three seed since we have had to play against those three teams. Also has if all three are 1-3 when the season ends will that be the first time in history someone has played against the top three teams in the country at season's end?

Man if we had just beat Purdue......:banghead2:
 
Last edited:
#2
#2
If things hold up and Kansas, Kentucky, and Purdue get 1 seeds that means he will have played 4 games against #1 seeds and hopefully we will have split (means we beat Kentucky saturday). But if not this still has to help our seeding. I think we got a shot at a 3 seed. If we win 3 of 4 and win 2 in SEC tourney I think we should get a three seed since we have had to play against those three teams. Also has if all three are 1-3 when the season ends will that be the first time in history someone has played against the top three teams in the country at season's end?

Man if we had just beat Purdue......:banghead2:
 
#3
#3
I don't really think it was necessary to post two separate threads that say exactly the same thing. But, hopefully the fact that we have played possibly 3 #1 seeds will help our seeding. But I think Purdue has to win the Big 10 tourney to get a #1, and I don't think they will. I think Ohio State will win that tourney.
 
#4
#4
Yeah helps us a lot if we beat UK, would have been even better had we beat them down there.
 
#5
#5
I don't really think it was necessary to post two separate threads that say exactly the same thing. But, hopefully the fact that we have played possibly 3 #1 seeds will help our seeding. But I think Purdue has to win the Big 10 tourney to get a #1, and I don't think they will. I think Ohio State will win that tourney.

Yeah I think Ohio State will take it to.
 
#7
#7
Sorry I double posted. I thought the first title was stupid but i had already went through. Anyone know how to delete a thread?
 
#12
#12
I don't really think it was necessary to post two separate threads that say exactly the same thing. But, hopefully the fact that we have played possibly 3 #1 seeds will help our seeding. But I think Purdue has to win the Big 10 tourney to get a #1, and I don't think they will. I think Ohio State will win that tourney.

Then why did you enter the thread and contribute?:blink:
 
#13
#13
Then why did you enter the thread and contribute?:blink:

I simply pointed out that he had 2 identical threads, but the subject was interesting.

You, on the other hand, got into a thread and then proceeded to criticize someone for contributing when you offered absolutely nothing of substance.

Of course, from your history on here, this comes as no surprise.
 
#14
#14
I simply pointed out that he had 2 identical threads, but the subject was interesting.

You, on the other hand, got into a thread and then proceeded to criticize someone for contributing when you offered absolutely nothing of substance.

Of course, from your history on here, this comes as no surprise.

You blast the thread, then compliment it. Sounds like a politician::peace2::peace2::peace2:
 
#15
#15
You blast the thread, then compliment it. Sounds like a politician::peace2::peace2::peace2:

No, actually I didn't blast the thread, but I don't guess I should expect someone of your mental capabilities to be able to understand that.

You see, when I say the subject of the thread was good, that means that I like the thread.

When I say you don't have to post the same thing twice, that doesn't have anything to do with the content of the thread.

If this is too difficult, just tell me and I'll see if I can find some visual aids for you.
 
#20
#20
I think we'll have to win out and win a couple games in the SEC tourney to get that high.

I think we will get a higher seed than most think. We have a good rpi and have played a tough schedule. Alot of potential high seeds are from bad conferences like BYU, New Mexico, Gonzaga, Butler and in the past the committee has seeded those kind of teams in the 6-7 range.
 
#21
#21
I think we will get a higher seed than most think. We have a good rpi and have played a tough schedule. Alot of potential high seeds are from bad conferences like BYU, New Mexico, Gonzaga, Butler and in the past the committee has seeded those kind of teams in the 6-7 range.

That's true. But I still think it's going to take a really good finish to get on the 3 line. I think somewhere between 4-6 is much more likely.
 
#22
#22
No, actually I didn't blast the thread, but I don't guess I should expect someone of your mental capabilities to be able to understand that.

You see, when I say the subject of the thread was good, that means that I like the thread.

When I say you don't have to post the same thing twice, that doesn't have anything to do with the content of the thread.

If this is too difficult, just tell me and I'll see if I can find some visual aids for you.

Hey, Lawvol can you see this visual aid? It is your IQ!
 
#23
#23
Hey, Lawvol can you see this visual aid? It is your IQ!

Good one, Alaska. That almost made sense. I apologize that there are some on here that are different from you and don't have their heads permanently up CBP's ass.

Oh, I forgot. You're a worshiper of Krispy Kreme as well. That tells me all I need to know.
 
#24
#24
Good one, Alaska. That almost made sense. I apologize that there are some on here that are different from you and don't have their heads permanently up CBP's ass.

Oh, I forgot. You're a worshiper of Krispy Kreme as well. That tells me all I need to know.

You have made me better appreciate the attitude toward lawyers in Henry VI .
 

VN Store



Back
Top