MAD
Arsenal FC, Detroit Lions
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 48,074
- Likes
- 117,379
What will the world be like post pandemic?
What do you all think?
Don’t forget the roaring 20’s followed the 1918 pandemic.
View attachment 332588
Now they are talking about a new strain that is immunization resistant............*ssssssssssiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh*
And they didn’t have antivirals, they didn’t have antibiotics to cover secondary bacterial infections, and they didn’t have ventilators.It also absolutely wrecked young people, which is why it was so bad.
Using 1918 as a comparison to now screeching about MUH MASKS is standard stupidity.
Demonstrably false. Masks had zero effect on the spread of the illness in 1918, and mask usage is proving to have negligible effect even now. A simple Google search will give you articles like the below, as well as pieces from rags like NYT and Washington Post if that's more your style.And they didn’t have antivirals, they didn’t have antibiotics to cover secondary bacterial infections, and they didn’t have ventilators.
What they did have were masks, and where they were worn, there was less disease and death.
Ah, I was thinking of this National Geographic report on the benefits of social distancing. I doubt that the simple cloth masks of the time were very effective.Demonstrably false. Masks had zero effect on the spread of the illness in 1918, and mask usage is proving to have negligible effect even now. A simple Google search will give you articles like the below, as well as pieces from rags like NYT and Washington Post if that's more your style.
https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200508.769108/full/
Wearing a cloth rag like those women are doing (and similar to a gaiter or bandanna people are wearing now) is shown to actually make things worse. If you're infected the large holes in the fabric help to spatter large droplets into much smaller ones.And they didn’t have antivirals, they didn’t have antibiotics to cover secondary bacterial infections, and they didn’t have ventilators.
What they did have were masks, and where they were worn, there was less disease and death.
Right, as I added above. If you’re going to do it, do it right.Wearing a cloth rag like those women are doing (and similar to a gaiter or bandanna people are wearing now) is shown to actually make things worse. If you're infected the large holes in the fabric help to spatter large droplets into much smaller ones.
I watched a special on covid last night, and they showed the masks that nurses wore. They were made out of gauze which was folded to be four layers thick. Horrible. On top of that nurses wore them to cover their mouths, but just under the nose.Wearing a cloth rag like those women are doing (and similar to a gaiter or bandanna people are wearing now) is shown to actually make things worse. If you're infected the large holes in the fabric help to spatter large droplets into much smaller ones.
You know, this is kind of fascinating to me. They know now that the "spanish flu" killed the young because the old were already immune. H1 flu had gone around in 1889, and people born before that were likely immune. Most places you'll find "age 40" cutoff was noticed by everyone at the time. Today, people born before 1957 are also immune to H1N1. They discovered that during the 2009 H1N1 epidemic. Who knew you could be immune to flu for 50 or 60 years? I didn't find this out until covid made me try to remember the 2009 one.It also absolutely wrecked young people, which is why it was so bad.
.