mtsuraider06
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,394
- Likes
- 3,654
Ugh! I wish 2K would have took this under their wing!
I remember playing that game when I was younger! I hate they didn't continue that aspect of the game! They even had an NCAA game where you could actually recruit year after year! That game was EVERYTHING to meSeconded. While the facial capture was impressive, Live gameplay mechanics suck.
Still, this is light years better than EA's previous women's basketball efforts. They had a mode in their NCAA game during the Meeks threepeat years, and they used the same player model for everyone. Their efforts at accurately representing the players is promising...now if someone can only fix the game motion.
I remember playing that game when I was younger! I hate they didn't continue that aspect of the game! They even had an NCAA game where you could actually recruit year after year! That game was EVERYTHING to me![]()
I agree about the gameplay motion! It's just not as exciting and fluid as 2K!
Unfortunately for EA, their games have not aged well. I guess it's kind of unfair of me to compare a current gen game to one that came out 20 years ago...but I could probably play the first NBA 2K game right now and not cringe. I can't say the same for EA's previous gen games.
EA clearly put a lot of effort into their WNBA player models. I have a hard time believing that 2K Sports would bother.
NBA Live in the past couple of years has been like $30 compared to $60 and you can bet (most if not all) the WNBA women and the young ladies in high school or middle school (who play or are interested in the sport) will more than likely want to purchase and play the game.
This could be very huge
Even at $30, Live is still a distant second to 2k because of the overall gap in quality of the game. I'm not sure the market for WNBA fans will be enough to make 2k rethink their strategy, particularly when some of those fans will still purchase 2k instead because as a basketball sim, it is a far, far better game.
There is no market for this which is why it is part of an NBA video game in the first place.
If there was a market for it, they would have just made WNBA Live.
Of course, if there was a market for women's basketball in general, the WNBA wouldn't have to be subsidized by the NBA to begin with....but that's a whole different story.
Programming on the CW gets higher ratings than the WNBA Finals.
I wish we could get to a point where Women's basketball fan and Soccer fan could accept facts about these things.
What I am saying is there are a lot of Women who plays the men game (even those in the WNBA) now that many of them can play as themselves they are more than likely to switch games as well as their fans and hardcore fans of the Women's game.
2K has become like Madden where it puts the same game out every year because there is no competition but losing several fans could force them to change their minds