Woman walking 10 hours in NYC (w/ a twist)

#2
#2
What's obvious to me is that the person filming is very biased toward wanting to prove a point. The "casual" clothing described as "jeans, a t-shirt, and a cardigan" is clearly much more than just casual. The "jeans" are not jeans, but rather very tight leggings... the "t-shirt" is not a typical t-shirt, but one that clearly accentuates her bustline... and the cardigan appears to be about two sizes too small, which also accentuates her figure.

So if his point was to try and prove that a woman who dresses for attention actually gets more attention, then I guess he proved his point. On the other hand, if he was somehow trying to make a comparison to a woman dressed in Hijab versus non-muslim clothing, then he should have put her in a full, casual dress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4
#4
What's obvious to me is that the person filming is very biased toward wanting to prove a point. The "casual" clothing described as "jeans, a t-shirt, and a cardigan" is clearly much more than just casual. The "jeans" are not jeans, but rather very tight leggings... the "t-shirt" is not a typical t-shirt, but one that clearly accentuates her bustline... and the cardigan appears to be about two sizes too small, which also accentuates her figure.

So if his point was to try and prove that a woman who dresses for attention actually gets more attention, then I guess he proved his point. On the other hand, if he was somehow trying to make a comparison to a woman dressed in Hijab versus non-muslim clothing, then he should have put her in a full, casual dress.

Have you seen the original? That woman didn't have on a cardigan. Same outfit outside of that.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1XGPvbWn0A[/youtube]
 
#6
#6
Not sure of the point of the videos.

The first video is a response video to the one I posted of the woman walking around NYC in the all black outfit. The woman in all black was using the video as an illustration of "street harassment" and how women are constantly under threat in their daily lives. The response video shows a woman walking 5 hours in the same outfit as the first and then 5 hours in a hijab.
 
#7
#7
Not sure of the point of the videos.

If you do a google search on "10 hours new york harassment", you'll see that this video has gone viral over the last two weeks with news stories and response videos and paradies. Here is one parody...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DCDYSJwwE4[/youtube]
 
#10
#10
The first video is a response video to the one I posted of the woman walking around NYC in the all black outfit. The woman in all black was using the video as an illustration of "street harassment" and how women are constantly under threat in their daily lives. The response video shows a woman walking 5 hours in the same outfit as the first and then 5 hours in a hijab.

I meant the point from their (The makers) perspective. I'm not sure what they're trying to prove it change.
 
#11
#11
I meant the point from their (The makers) perspective. I'm not sure what they're trying to prove it change.

Its obvious what they are trying to prove. The original video by the woman in black is trying to prove that women are harassed. The makers of the response video with the woman in the hijab is saying that it matters what you wear (or in another sense, it matters where you walk).
 

VN Store



Back
Top