Would the OLD SWC be a BCS conference?

#1

Bennett4UT

Vol in Dawg country
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
2,475
Likes
1
#1
In honor of Arkansas week here is a hypothetical for yall....

If the old Southwestern Confrence still existed would it be a BCS conference?

The members were(with current conference):
Arkansas(SEC)
Baylor(Big 12)
Houston(Conf USA)
Rice(Conf USA)
SMU(Conf USA)
Texas(Big 12)
Texas A&M(Big 12)
TCU(Mountain West)
Texas Tech (Big 12)
 
#3
#3
I think so. Especially if you back to the days when Oklahoma in the conference. They cheated a lot in that conference, but they sure played good football.
 
#4
#4
You bet it would. That list is better than the Big East and just about as good as the Big 12. Pluse it would be a BCS conference because you have big time schools in Texas, Arkansas, Texas A&M and Baylor.
 
#5
#5
I think so. Especially if you back to the days when Oklahoma in the conference. They cheated a lot in that conference, but they sure played good football.
Oklahoma was never in the SWC. They were in the Big 8.
 
#6
#6
In honor of Arkansas week here is a hypothetical for yall....

If the old Southwestern Confrence still existed would it be a BCS conference?

The members were(with current conference):
Arkansas(SEC)
Baylor(Big 12)
Houston(Conf USA)
Rice(Conf USA)
SMU(Conf USA)
Texas(Big 12)
Texas A&M(Big 12)
TCU(Mountain West)
Texas Tech (Big 12)
The presence of Texas alone would get them a BCS automatic bid.
 
#7
#7
Oklahoma was never in the SWC. They were in the Big 8.

Dangit . . . That's right. After I posted that I thought to myself "Wait a minute - then how did they play Nebraska every year?"
 
#8
#8
I saw Oklahoma mentioned as being in the SWC in another thread and thought that sounded wrong. However, after researching it, they were a member of the SWC... from 1915 through 1919.
 
#9
#9
I think with the Wishbone and probation, they just seem like such a natural fit for the SWC . . .
 

VN Store



Back
Top