VolByLaw
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2019
- Messages
- 1,741
- Likes
- 36,973
Didnāt you know? @Jaxon_Vol2017 knows everything.AP explicitly said they didn't want to talk money.
Back then there were different rules. And if you look at the per recruit average, we were barely in the top 10. The per recruit averages would have looked like this:If its because we had 34 commits, I was under the impression that only the top 25 recruits counted. If im wrong I stand corrected.
...and then on top of that, many of those 34 guys were WAY overrated and ended up being busts.Back then there were different rules. And if you look at the per recruit average, we were barely in the top 10. The per recruit averages would have looked like this:
1. Bama- 93.73
2. FSU- 92.54
3. USC- 92.28
4. UCLA- 91.63
5. ND- 90.45
6. OSU- 90.31
7. AU- 90.16
8. LSU- 89.91
9. UGA- 89.71
10. TN- 89.48
Butchs ātop 5 classā was fraudulent.
Yep. One would assume he would start alongside Smith next year as well. Offer Smith whatever he wants to come here. That dude is a 1 overall draft pick when he goes pro. Make them overpay to keep him.Not sure what incentive Tate would have to jump ship when heās playing for the best WR coach in the country and starting. If he did, Iād have to imagine heād consider us though.
I donāt recall an instance of them losing a starter. Heās getting plenty of snaps and opportunity to produce.
A lot of his guys went and stayed in the NFL though. Not sure how many from that classBack then there were different rules. And if you look at the per recruit average, we were barely in the top 10. The per recruit averages would have looked like this:
1. Bama- 93.73
2. FSU- 92.54
3. USC- 92.28
4. UCLA- 91.63
5. ND- 90.45
6. OSU- 90.31
7. AU- 90.16
8. LSU- 89.91
9. UGA- 89.71
10. TN- 89.48
Butchs ātop 5 classā was fraudulent.
...and then on top of that, many of those 34 guys were WAY overrated and ended up being busts.