SayNoToJorts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,566
- Likes
- 3,588
I'm sure there are still many who feel like it is unfair, but curious if anyone has now changed their mind after getting a taste of how great the Third Saturday can be?
No . . . I still think permanent conference opponents are a complete dinosaur and never equitable. If they go to a 9 game schedule, they can rotate opponents so that we'd play everybody at least every 2nd year anyway. We'd just play Alabama 3 or 4 out of 5 years instead of every year. It wouldn't be that big of a deal.I'm sure there are still many who feel like it is unfair, but curious if anyone has now changed their mind after getting a taste of how great the Third Saturday can be?
Georgia and Florida have only had it easier because we were down. We have always played those three and used to play Auburn a lot more often as well. When we were good it didn't matter.As the conference continues to expand; I would like to see a more fair, round-robin scheduling system in place. It seems Tennessee always finds itself in a scheduling disadvantage in comparison to our division rivals. Consistently having a tougher path than Georgia and Florida every year is absurd.
Georgia and Florida have only had it easier because we were down. We have always played those three and used to play Auburn a lot more often as well. When we were good it didn't matter.
No way to I want to give up the chance for a more regular occurrence of what happened this past Saturday night. The rivalry is historic and would be akin to no Texas/Oklahoma every year or no USC/Notre Dame.
The game simply has to be played.
We have played Auburn only 54 times. That is @bout have as many times +o pared to Alabama, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt. No way Auburn should be there. If you are afraid to play Vandy, add Ga. Tech to the SEC and play them.Agreed but you need Auburn in there for us and Bama both historically speaking or permanent game with them for Bama at least.
How in the world did you get anyone was afraid to play Vandy out of that? The overwhelming point is there is no way you can separate Alabama from Auburn and he was saying historical matchups. At least prior to divisions (the first 80 or so years of Souther Conf/SEC) we played Auburn a whole crap ton more than Georgia, Florida, LSU etc.We have played Auburn only 54 times. That is @bout have as many times +o pared to Alabama, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt. No way Auburn should be there. If you are afraid to play Vandy, add Ga. Tech to the SEC and play them.
Noones trying to convince you. It's a dumb opinion and simply doesn't matterIn all fairness, every team within the same division play each other out of necessity but everything outside of the division should be round robin. No one can convince me that having Alabama on the schedule every year has ever helped us. If the Tennessee/Alabama rivalry is important enough that it needs to be a yearly occurrence then move Bama to the eastern division.