kidbourbon
Disgusting!
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 5,040
- Likes
- 20
Texas is very strong team, despite their recent losses. Lots of size and rebounding, which goes well with tourney play, provided that Pittman shows up consistently.
Syracuse is the most complete team in the country. Their length and their ability to play within the game and not force too many errant shots make them a easy pick for the Final Four. My other three would be Kentucky, Nova, and Michigan St.(Don't know why, but they always seem to get nice draws and play hard in the end.)
Everything you said is correct, and I was originally quite bullish on Texas....until I actually sat down and watched one of their games in its entirety.
Rick Barnes is a weak link. His coaching deficiencies are similar in nature to -- but greater in magnitude* than -- some of the oft-repeated Pearl criticisms. Namely, installing an effective half court offense and properly managing a deep rotation.
They are seriously loaded, though, and could definitely make a run if they are able to lubricate their presently-chaffing half court sets.
*in my estimation.
They look good, but my $$$ is still on Coach Cal and company.
2007-2008 Memphis > 2009-2010 Kentucky. Veteran team that had been there before + 1 super freshman. If Cal couldn't win with that bunch up 9 with 2 to go, I don't see him doing it with a Freshman heavy team, regardless of their talent. I realize Patterson and Miles have been there a while, but they have been part of mediocre teams and haven't been in big games, much less know how to win them.
If these "Fab 5" get rattled by a mediocre South Carolina team, what will they do against the more veteran teams at MIchigan State, KU, Syracuse, and Texas when the chips are down in the Sweet 16 or E8?
.
JMO, I think 'Nova wins it all because...
1. Final Four Experience
2. Scotty Reynolds is the best leader in the country
3. Corey Fisher and Corey Stokes are two of the best 3-point shooters around.