I'm sure if Heupel goes 10-2 with the generational QB and all "his" guys in year 5, then in year 10 when he is still 10-2 you will keep acting like "aNy DaY nOw".
If you'd have seen my other posts I am including SEC title because the OP didn't specify, he just said "a" title. Didn't manning win the SEC in 97?
Again, if Heupel did what he did in 22 yet can't come closer to winning the SEC with all his guys and a lab created QB in year 5, when is he doing it???
I beg you to quote anywhere I've said that him going 11-2 this year I would even be close to want to fire him. I've not said anything even remotely close. You don't understand, my friend, that I only remember from 03 because I'm only 33. I only know suckage. I was over the moon in 22. Last year...
So Heupel takes a terrible team gutted of players and wins 11 games in his 2nd year with a QB no one heard of.
Yet in year 5 with a QB built in a lab to run Heupels offense he goes 11-2 again and not close to winning any sort of title and you don't see a major red flag with Heupel?
That's...
I didn't specify a title because the OP didn't specify a title. He said if Nico doesn't win "a" title. The assumption includes the SEC. I'd be insane to suggest Heupel isn't the guy if he doesn't win a Natty by year 5.
I'm not saying you are but you come off as a really stupid individual.