I did for a while till I realized that person just can't think for themselves...
It's the ones that live on Twitter and only argue for gotchas and not actually knowledge..
There is a difference between criminal definition and regular definition...higher standard for a criminal conviction.
Btw according to your link in GA, the threshold is 2...
From your link
Riot, in criminal law, a violent offense against public order involving three or more people.
Where is the 5 number coming from... And that's in order to charge someone criminally. A different standard then a defined by the anti riot act
Yes it is 1 in three acting violently...if there is 10 and 1 guy is violent not a riot...3 outta 10 per the anti riot act is posted is a riot.. the is a defined threshold for a riot.
Technically you could claim that, as long as you can define how many were at certain protests and not try to use...
So if 1 of those protest was violent, you 100% believe those counting would label that as 1 violent protest or more likely say well 80% of the protests were peaceful..that's the issue
Maybe a better statement is the most publicly noteable BLM protests were violent