It was a travel before it was a foul, but I was watching it on my phone with the volume off and until I saw highlights later I just assumed they called the hook because it was so obvious.It shouldn't have been a travel, it should have been a foul. He hooked his arm around the defender's leg.
Could have called either one, offensive foul or a travel. I'm just glad they blew their whistle
Unbelievable that Antoine Walker ( former UK player of course) said on the SEC Network that the "refs should not decide the game and should have not made that call. ". Really Antoine, so only call walking if it might not determine the outcome of a game? What an assanine statementClearly a walk even in real time. He caught the ball with his right foot on the ground and left in the air. Then put down left foot and lifted right foot. So worst case left foot is pivot foot and has to stay down until dribble. Then he lifts left foot and puts down right foot before dribble. So he changed pivot feet. Then he does it again before dribble. Picks up right and puts down left. Then drops ball out of his hands for dribble. He changed pivot foot not once, but twice.
And the fact is that even if you think he didn’t travel there’s no question he hooked Schofield. Either way it is an illegal offensive play.A win is a win. Real time it certainly didn’t look to be, but when they did a frame by frame, it appeared he started stepping before putting the ball down on the floor. I thought some foul calls were poorly called against the Vols as well.
Clearly a walk even in real time. He caught the ball with his right foot on the ground and left in the air. Then put down left foot and lifted right foot. So worst case left foot is pivot foot and has to stay down until dribble. Then he lifts left foot and puts down right foot before dribble. So he changed pivot feet. Then he does it again before dribble. Picks up right and puts down left. Then drops ball out of his hands for dribble. He changed pivot foot not once, but twice.