Boy you never give us any credit. For weeks now people have been saying, Let's see how we do against non cupcakes. Well they beat Rutgers and Stanford. Holding each to a total of 45 and 40 points. You are a fan who will clearly never give Holly or this team any kudos for playing a great game and executing a clear defensive strategy.
Credit is given when its earned. Those are nice wins outside the Top 10 (Stanford is ranked top 10). I mean, I said nice wins. You have your standards, I have my own.
I thought both wins against Rutgers and Stanford was solid, we were suppose to win those games but I did like the effort, defense and rebounding.
But come on now Stanford is not that good, and if you want to believe that win is all that, fine. We beat Stanford...woohooo.
Personally, I think the Rutgers win was more impressive, they were a veteran team.
And if you were to read my posts,I do both (praise and critic) but the truth is Stanford is young and inexperienced.
Nice win, cos its Stanford but they didn't have the athletes to challenge our players.
I believe defense and rebounds wins Championship with good guard play, until our guard play picks up,or we see consistency or wins against top 10 or 5 opponents.
That play ok, we make it to the sweet sixteen maybe, we play for Championships, do I enjoy the wins, yes I enjoy all of them but we still have a lot of work to do.
I am high achiever, I have high standard, that what has allowed me to be successful, that's why I love Pat.I wont apologize for my view being different and for my standards being high. Nice win ladies, we beat team that has owned us for past three years.
So yes, I'm happy but Stanford had no low post threat, none.
I don't get high or low, I stay pretty consistent with my views and or opinions.
I back Pat and roll with Holly.