TennesseeTarheel
Sorry, but, this IS my day job.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
- Messages
- 8,919
- Likes
- 14,415
I would not expect the current uncertainly, at least from the compliance department, to be uncertain when the new coach is hired. The investigation seems to be moving rather quickly.You're right, things may not be that severe, but the uncertainty is enough to prevent any good coach from coming here. To m this is definitely not a step in a favorable direction.
I don’t have any information about this situation. My comment was intended to state my opinion that any potential coaches would be informed about the extent of the issues, if any. I don’t think the school would go into a coaching search with swirling rumors about compliance issues without having something to tell potential candidates. Unless significant sanctions are expected, I don’t think a coaching search would be impacted.Based on what information? I'm truly asking. I havent seen anything of substance, only rumors.
**** really can't get any worse though. My source emailed last night that the powers that be are finished with pruitt and gave some color to the eric gray, Brian Maurer absence yesterday. He also said that Freeze is not really an option especially with current compliance issues we are facing and we will probably get a Billy Napier or Jamey Chadwell, then made a statement that we will probably be back in this situation again in 3-4 years. Rise/repeat.
Lol... I guess your source is a dumba**. In his mind we can’t hire freeze bc of compliance issues, but we will hire Chadwell even though he has past compliance issues resulting in like 18 vacated wins and probation?
It’s so funny watching how many people with “sources” come out from everywhere each coaching change.
We are talking about Phil Fulmer here. Back stabbing is his specialty.I agree and have said it before. If this is anyone internally stabbing this coaching staff in the heart, bleeding them out publicly like this in order to get out of some of the buyout (???), then what will follow in the coming years will make a $20million buyout seem cheap.
So your source thinks we can’t hire freeze bc of his ncaa issues, but chadwells ncaa issues don’t matter and we’ll hire him? How is that logical?