Volinbham Talks Marketing and Bud Light

#27
#27
At bit more on the power of image/positioning and beer.

Miller Lite was not the first light beer but it quickly became the dominant market leader via positioning (and distribution advantage).

Most light beers marketed themselves as diet beers. But the reality people serious about dieting aren't going to drink a lot of beer.

Miller Lite chose "less filling" as the feature to emphasis rather than "fewer calories" and the message was you could drink more without getting bloated or drink more for the same calories. People who drink a lot of beer at time bought into the less filling benefit.
RIP GOAT!

 
#28
#28
They should kill the brand "Bud Lite". Then come back in with a better product in time for Super Bowl 2024 with a big ad blitz. Maybe get out of the "Lite Beer" business all together and just go in the opposite direction. Maybe offer a heavier/more flavorful "beer".
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#31
#31
the original line up of the Miller Lite guys were definitely not dieters - it was the implied "you can drink more of this" message embedded in the less filling. The "tastes great" was to assure people it wasn't some watered down beer.

concise and effective - Tastes great; less filling.
I want x-ter credit fer keepin up with this sh... stuff
 
#32
#32
They should kill the brand "Bud Lite". Then come back in with a better product in time for Super Bowl 2024 with a big ad blitz. Maybe get out of the "Lite Beer" business all together and just go in the opposite direction. Maybe offer a heavier/more flavorful "beer".

no way - it still generates huge revenue and they have so many ancillary brands tied to it like seltzers

some of the sales will come back and it will still outsell Bud Heavy, Busch, Busch Light, Natty, Ultra and on and on.

it was a F-up that will sting for a while
 
#37
#37
2 grades if he said "jif" in his head when he wrote it

Speaking of Peanut Butter. The new one on Foods that Built America was really good. A lot of creative marketing for JIF, which even went to court for years as its peanut content % was questionable as to be called PB.

Circled it back to marketing to not derail the thread..lol
 
#38
#38
Rather than clutter up the threads I thought I'd give my extended take on why the Bud Light scenario was a predictable marketing failure.

This will be a multi-post review. It will be lectury at times since that's what I do for a living.

Part 1: Marketing Basics: Customer Perceptions, Branding and Positioning

A fundamental of applying Marketing is recognizing that customer perceptions are your reality. "The Customer is always Right" doesn't mean that customers are factually correct, reasonable, rational etc. It means they approach the exchange with their beliefs, perceptions, desires. If you want to do business with them you must recognize their perceptions and either 1) change them or 2) meet them. If you cannot do either the smart move is to seek customers you can match with. Just as customers choose providers, providers should choose customers. The problem arises when you don't understand their perceptions then can't understand why they didn't choose you.

Branding and Positioning are very closely related with Positioning being how customers view you relative to the competition (your position in the market) where as Branding is the entire collection of impressions, images, feelings etc that are conjured by the seeing/hearing the brand.

Positioning is important in differentiating against direct competitors. How is Bud Light different than Miller Lite? Than Budweiser? Than Sierra Nevada? Think Walmart and Target - two retailers that are miles more alike than different in approach to retailing and merchandise yet most people familiar with each see them as distinctly different. That is the power of positioning.

Branding is important in differentiating and decision making. A brand communicates the characteristics and consistency of a product so when I go to choose I don't have to do some long feature calculus. I see Taco Bell and I know exactly what I'm getting. They don't have to explain everything to me - just ring the bell, show the sign/logo and all that information is communicated.

So where is Bud Light positioned? A domestic light beer that is not heavy, is available everywhere and has been linked to fun, good times, downing brewskis. The Bud Light brand includes all those impressions plus the distinctive labeling, the link to AB and even Spuds MacKenzie if you're old enough.

Both branding and positioning are critical differentiators in markets with many competitors that don't have strong product differentiation. Bud Light isn't much different than almost any mass market domestic brew. My bet is most people drink it because it's an easy choice (the brand) and they aren't about having the best beer but rather having beer while they have a good time.
So, trans libations are the future?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#46
#46
Xylophone as a Metaphor for Zoology
Please breakdown the different classifications of light beer and how overconsumption of each brand impacts behavior across southern college campuses. Sounds like you’re the guy with the expertise for this perplexing problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#48
#48
Please breakdown the different classifications of light beer and how overconsumption of each brand impacts behavior across southern college campuses. Sounds like you’re the guy with the expertise for this perplexing problem.

freshman 15, unwanted pregnancies, date rape, cringy frat dudes and the "whoo" in Rocky Top
 

VN Store



Back
Top