The Title Nine violation report is discoverable on the internet. You can read the specific charges, which include taking photos of coeds and sending them to them, and sending unsolicited/unwanted pictures of his genitals. The charge burden includes stalking and harassment under the statute. The substantial photographic evidence is referenced in several articles. The (alleged) victim count is over ten, and they are not related to one another and took place over more than a year. It’s hard to find ten unrelated young women who report identical behavior over a year. If you think he wouldn’t sue all of them for defamation if it were made up, you’re missing something big. Neither he nor his attorney ever refuted existence of photos he took of female students and sent to them, nor pics of his junk that he allegedly sent to them. The investigation was funded by UF. It proved one thing: the actions did not rise to the level of stalking or harassment under the legal definition. I do not know whether that assumption is correct, but it was the conclusion of the paid firm. One of attorneys for the victims stated that the existence of photo evidence was not disputed, only the evidence of stalking or harassment. You can find all of that online. If he were to countersue for damages , the evidence would enter public record. He won’t. As for whether the women will pursue individual civil litigation, one or more of them need to be willing to face the public scrutiny of shirtless, acid-washed inhabitants of a primitive rabid banana republic. I hope one or more of them goes public, but the incentives are nonexistent and the risk of harm to them and their reputations is high.
