#1 seed

Florida is playing so well defeating them is going to be extremely difficult, but that’s kind of the point with this whole argument.

If we beat Florida and they are still a 1-seed we will have beaten 1 seeds on back to back to days with nearly identical records and metrics. How does that not garner us a 1 seed too. That’s the craziest part about a a win tomorrow. We will have beaten one seeds on back-to-back days in an conf tournament and not be a one ourselves. I bet the house that has never happened before.
 
He has a pretty good success rate, but I find it hard not to wonder whether he may back channel with the Committee or at a minimum, how much the Committee may be influenced by his picks. If so, that would tend to help his success rate a good bit. I have no proof, but I find it curious.
 
I’ve watched several games since our win against Auburn. All commentators have suggested that regardless of the outcome tomorrows’ games, the #1 seeds will be Auburn, Duke, Houston, and Florida. So my question is, why even play? Why not forfeit? Just get some rest. And no need to risk injury.
 
I'd really like to know how in the world Auburn who lost 3 of their last 4 is still the top 1 seed??
Total resume is very impressive. Wins at neutral site over Iowa St (#3 seed), UNC, Purdue (#5seed), OSU, Memphis (#8 seed) AND Houston (#1 seed). Lost only AT Duke (#1 seed), 1 and 1 against Bama (#2 seed) 1 and 1 UT (#2/#1 seed), and Florida (#1/#2 seed) and lost at TAM after their regular season championship was clinched. So only 1 loss against a non #1 or #2 seed and that was on the road to a #4 seed. Not advocating for them but just pointing out their argument.
 

VN Store



Back
Top