volme
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2011
- Messages
- 258
- Likes
- 686
Our run defense was number 59 in the country while it’s not great it’s still pretty decent. Another year of experience makes a world of difference. Plenty of good Dlineman usually take a few years to reach their full potentialMaybe you didn't watch this past season. Experience doesn't make one a good football player.
Our offense necessitates the need for depth. Especially big bodied maulers.Our run defense was number 59 in the country while it’s not great it’s still pretty decent. Another year of experience makes a world of difference. Plenty of good Dlineman usually take a few years to reach their full potential
We have like 4 defensive tackles coming back with experience why is this considered a position of need?
We have like 4 defensive tackles coming back with experience why is this considered a position of need?
Right so 4 experienced guys returning with guys like Dom Bailey, Phillips and West added. That’s 6-7 guys on the depth chart depending on West’s position and only two can play at a time seems like the rotation is fine right now…Considering our discrepancy in time of possession, the need to keep DL fresh, and the injury rate of linemen I'm kinda feeling like you've already answered your own question.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But if you still need more explanation, our DLs that led the team in tackles are:
Matthew Butler - 47
Jay Blakely - 29
Omari Thomas - 21
Da'Jon Terry - 19
Caleb Tremblay - 18
Kurott Garland - 16
Elijah Simmons - 11
Aubrey Solomon - 8 (6 against TN Tech)
Butler, Blakely, and Tremblay (3 of the top 5) were all "Super Seniors" and out of eligibility. Solomon clearly fell out of favor w/CRG and hasn't confirmed if he'll return and use his extra year of eligibility.
The current recruiting class has just 2 DL commitments. Last year's class had just 1.
Our front 7 is horrible. We lack depth, especially quality depth. Nobody on the DL is a standout we need any help on the DL we can get. The kids coming in will be freshman, I’d rather not rely on themRight so 4 experienced guys returning with guys like Dom Bailey, Phillips and West added. That’s 6-7 guys on the depth chart depending on West’s position and only two can play at a time seems like the rotation is fine right now…
Who said anything about DE? We’re talking about DT depth. Our rush defense was ranked 59th in the country let’s not exaggerate that as “horrible” with 4 guys with experience returning and 3 other guys included into the mix that seems like a good rotationOur front 7 is horrible. We lack depth, especially quality depth. Nobody on the DL is a standout we need any help on the DL we can get. The kids coming in will be freshman, I’d rather not rely on them
Right so 4 experienced guys returning with guys like Dom Bailey, Phillips and West added. That’s 6-7 guys on the depth chart depending on West’s position and only two can play at a time seems like the rotation is fine right now…
It’s almost like you disregard other areas of need on the roster and our apparent numbers crunch, why waste a scholly on a one year guy when we have plenty returning that makes no senseIt's like I've just explained to a child why the Atlantic Ocean is a large body of water using exact figures of depth, width, and volume and he responds with, "Right so only about 4 inches across here on this globe, so pretty small, really."
We need that scholly this year though is my point, we have other needs
Morten and Jenkins are not one year rentals that is the differenceI guess somebody forgot to tell Coaches Heupel and Banks that then. Seems odd that they wouldn't know that we have "4 experienced" DTs already (whatever the F that's supposed to mean) and continue to go after tackles like Moten and Jenkins.
Morten and Jenkins are not one year rentals that is the difference
All being equal, I think I'd rather have Moten who could be developed over a 1-year player, but he is an all ACC honorable mention at a position of need. Could be a plug-and-play to fill Butler's spot.
I mean the staff seems to think like me considering we are not even pursuing this guy so yeah…1. That's def. not a certainty anymore, for any recruit.
2. And even if true, they'd also take up more than 1 year of a scholarship.
But hey, here's the my original post that caused you to chime in.
But if you want to think that the 59th ranked run defense losing both starters and 3 of it's top 5 tackles doesn't create a position need, you do you, sport.