Banks don't create legal tender. Banks rarely, if ever, forward loan proceeds to a borrower in the form of legal tender.
If you think the banks are bad, then just wait til the payday lenders and various other MSBs get a bigger share of the market.
My point is that you can't just create money exponentially if there's no demand from borrowers. In theory, a fractional system could turn $100 into $1,000 using current reserve requirements, but they can't just create credit for the sake of creating credit without the market intervening.
The thing is... The CFPB just dropped the hammer on those guys too. All the installment lenders I do business with are trying to figure out whether they're going to be collateral damage. Consumer credit is becoming endangered all the way around.
Any credit squeeze is going to stifle growth.
I'm sure he won't. But this entire debate has been about whether or not we should call something what it happens to be. "Legal tender" is not a nebulous term.
So "legal tender" is a non nebulous "legal certificate" of some sort with a valuation that may or may not be backed by something of tangible value? Of course, if it's floated, it doesn't mean it's backed by much of anything tangible.
How can you have growth without manufacturing and industry? Remember we moved that offshore. Or are we back to the Ponzi thing again?