37620VOL
Barely-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 7,538
- Likes
- 15,228
Looking at our returning roster, it's even more obvious why we need Darby. Only Davis shoots 3s and greater than 25%. I hope Horston can shoot.
I have tried ignore, but you still see the person's name as a poster and what I see I can't truly ignore. Especially if I know that that person is spewing negativity at every post....No, someone like that I see as a foe, not a friend and when someone is a butthole just to be a butthole, they need to be wiped
Playing in the SEC and playing a national OOC schedule demands the implementation of all dimensions on offense.
Harper and staff’s task is to study film to determine why those %ages are that low. Were their attempts ill-advised? desperation? poor mechanics? Or were they attempted within the concept and structure of the offense? Probably not the latter based on the poor spacing, non-productive screening action, and disorganization that I saw so prevalent under the former coach.
Judging Harper on how she incorporated the 3-pt shot at Missouri St. is comparatively unsound. The personnel on her team resembled what she prepared to face game in and game out in her conference. Playing in the SEC and playing a national OOC schedule demands the implementation of all dimensions on offense. Perhaps the addition of Darby fills a need that Harper has identified (and most of us on here think is a glaring need). And, theoretically, if she is an effective 3-pt specialist, conceivably she should be even more effective from the short corner and the elbow and the FT line and etc. We need a (some?) weapon(s) from distance to start keeping defenses honest and create some space for our inside players and for more purposeful Tess Darby played the long game - and won
Not necessarily. South Carolina has been at or near the top of the SEC for years even winning a National Championship and I wouldn't consider them a great perimeter shooting team. Baylor won the title last year and the three-pointer was almost an afterthought in their offense, hitting maybe two or three a game...
And those two teams have had excess in other areas—namely depth, size, and athleticism—that allowed them to compensate and overcome (if not overwhelm) their opponents.
Really good article posted by River67 above (link in orange font embedded at end of the quoted post).
Sure sounds as though Tess, Mom, and Dad are wholly realistic about the hard work ahead and the need to maximize strengths and improve weaknesses. Their attitudes about teams needing players filling various roles who will embrace those roles are savvy and down to earth.
Didn't know that Tess was a top 70 recruit in sophomore year before missing summer ball and subsequently falling off raters' radar.
Love this gal already!
Really good article posted by River67 above (link in orange font embedded at end of the quoted post).
Sure sounds as though Tess, Mom, and Dad are wholly realistic about the hard work ahead and the need to maximize strengths and improve weaknesses. Their attitudes about teams needing players filling various roles who will embrace those roles are savvy and down to earth.
Didn't know that Tess was a top 70 recruit in sophomore year before missing summer ball and subsequently falling off raters' radar.
Love this gal already!
Well she is no longer unranked number 144 overall and a four star that is quite a jump from not even having your name on the list at all.How DARE you and River67 spoil the perverse enjoyment of those who are bashing Coach Harper for signing an "unranked" recruit. Unabashed "bashing joy" requires that we completely ignore mitigating factors like injuries at a crucial time when national rankings are formed or Darby's great work ethic and attitude or the insane idea that an astute coach may recognize attributes and potential in an athlete that are not reflected in national rankings? I mean who wants a coach that actually scouts and assesses players and thinks about team chemistry, complementary skills, and other factors that go into building a championship team?
Have you never eaten at Krispy Kreme Holes (what a rip off, I paid for a hole in the middle of this strupid glazed circle thing! ) or drunk from the always half empty cup?; next you will probably tell, us that you did not always receive lumps of coal for Christmas presents?
Really good article posted by River67 above (link in orange font embedded at end of the quoted post).
Sure sounds as though Tess, Mom, and Dad are wholly realistic about the hard work ahead and the need to maximize strengths and improve weaknesses. Their attitudes about teams needing players filling various roles who will embrace those roles are savvy and down to earth.
Didn't know that Tess was a top 70 recruit in sophomore year before missing summer ball and subsequently falling off raters' radar.
Love this gal already!
PRG _ We (including me ) put toooo much importance on these recruiting services !
obviously, it is as important to make the better AAU teams in the Summer if a player is too be ranked, by comparison to other ranked players, plus the helpful AAU coaches. Not a perfect science . I remember reading an article of a HS girl from Texas who stayed home to work on her skills during the summer and it was newsworthy because it was not the right way.
Similarly, we have boarders who have concluded our recruit 16-17 will be a three point specialist when she graduates from UT (five years from now). PRG we put too much importance of knowing (as one who has appreciated your passion for many years)
Thanks .... I guess ?
I enjoy the recruiting process and watching the recruits as they develop. I’ll give you another head scratcher.... Rhyne Howard #38 ranked out of high school. She was just voted first team all SEC (as a Sophomore) .
Watching her in the Tennessee High School tournament. She was more interested in getting her teammates involved than getting more points for herself ! I guarantee you Mitchell will drive that right out of her and make her be more selfish. Which will make her a stronger and/or better player ! JMO