SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 51,108
- Likes
- 62,850
This is a dumb and baseless comment. Of all the things you could pick on Trump about you choose this? The vast majority of people do not require O2 and there is nothing pointing towards Trump requiring it at this point.Trump bitching out is probably for the best. He would have been humiliated when he had to get supplemental oxygen on national television.
This is a dumb and baseless comment. Of all the things you could pick on Trump about you choose this? The vast majority of people do not require O2 and there is nothing pointing towards Trump requiring it at this point.
The dems who get all caught up on so called lies by Trump have some explaining to do as we can start a list of Beijing Biden and Harris' lies
They have said they will end fracking
The continued Charlottesville lie
Biden said he would end the Trump tax cuts would would increase just about everyones taxes
And now it's clear she lied about Lincoln saying it wouldn't be right to nominate a SC justice during an election
if Trump has a negative test then I would agree.
Coronavirus update: New England Journal of Medicine says Trump should be voted out over pandemic management as U.S. death toll nears 212,000
‘When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent,’ say editors
+1 for science!
The Scientist also contacted authors of the NEJM paper, which included the statement that “all the authors reviewed the manuscript and vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the data provided.” SreyRam Kuy did not respond, and her institution, Baylor College of Medicine, tells The Scientist that she is unavailable for comment. Timothy Henry of Christ Hospital in Cincinnati acknowledges he hadn’t seen Surgisphere’s data when the team submitted the NEJM paper, but tells The Scientist in an interview that it’s common practice for coauthors on clinical research to review only summary data, and that there was nothing suspicious about Surgisphere’s dataset at the time. He says he doesn’t believe the data were fabricated and that he thinks NEJM retracted the paper too quickly, adding that the paper’s conclusions have since been “proven to be correct,” suggesting that the problems lie with the data source rather than “data accuracy.”
The scientific community is often unclear on how to treat the coauthors of researchers accused of fraud or other misconduct, says Stefan Eriksson, who directs the Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics at Uppsala University in Sweden. But the situation is more black-and-white for authors who formally vouch for a published study, as all five NEJM authors did and as Patel did on the Lancet paper. “You can’t escape your responsibility” in this case, Eriksson says. By assuring journals of the veracity of the dataset without having taken the necessary steps to confirm it, a researcher has effectively “betrayed the publishing culture, and science in a sense, as much as if you were part in the making up of data.”
You do realize that the NEJM as well as several other leading medical journals rushed to publish a falsified "study" from a nobody research group denouncing hydroxychloroquine? Look up Surgisphere. This is just one of many articles about the debacle - and it's not from the normal MSM clowns. So much for NEJM's credibility.
The Surgisphere Scandal: What Went Wrong?
It doesn’t matter if they end up right or not if they post false information.... that makes multiple times they have had to apologize for posting falsified studiesAnd NEJM was 100% correct.
Per the FDA:
June 15, 2020 Update: Based on ongoing analysis and emerging scientific data, FDA has revoked the emergency use authorization (EUA) to use hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to treat COVID-19 in certain hospitalized patients when a clinical trial is unavailable or participation is not feasible. We made this determination based on recent results from a large, randomized clinical trial in hospitalized patients that found these medicines showed no benefit for decreasing the likelihood of death or speeding recovery. This outcome was consistent with other new data, including those showing the suggested dosing for these medicines are unlikely to kill or inhibit the virus that causes COVID-19. As a result, we determined that the legal criteria for the EUA are no longer met. Please refer to the Revocation of the EUA Letter and FAQs on the Revocation of the EUA for Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate and Chloroquine Phosphate for more information.
Who ya gonna believe, Dumb Donald or the FDA?