2020 Presidential Race

#53,201
#53,201
volfanhill said:
He’s already agreed to them. But if I were him I would just sit back and watch Trump continue to run off any undecideds
Click to expand...
He didn't agree to share the same stage with someone who tested positive for COVID less than two weeks earlier. If Trump doesn't consent to a virtual debate, then I don't see it happening.
 
#53,203
#53,203
BP4Prez said:
Was that meant to be public?
Click to expand...

let's check my go to magic 8 ball

magic8ball2.0.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, MWR, AM64 and 1 other person
#53,204
#53,204
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
She's a total straight up hands-down idiot whose dreams are of more power to be her state's biggest buffoon..
Click to expand...
She is more popular in that state than Trump is right now... And I thought all of the whacko extremists were on the left? Hatching a plot to kidnap a sitting governor, sure seems pretty far out on the loony limb to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, tvolsfan and Hunerwadel
#53,206
#53,206
BowlBrother85 said:
She is more popular in that state than Trump is right now... And I thought all of the whacko extremists were on the left? Hatching a plot to kidnap a sitting governor, sure seems pretty far out on the loony limb to me.
Click to expand...

Your opinion on this matter to me doesn't mean jack-sh!t. She's a dumb-ass just like most liberals running states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin, AM64, StarRaider and 1 other person
#53,207
#53,207
BowlBrother85 said:
She is more popular in that state than Trump is right now... And I thought all of the whacko extremists were on the left? Hatching a plot to kidnap a sitting governor, sure seems pretty far out on the loony limb to me.
Click to expand...
www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/08/suspect-in-gretchen-whitmer-kidnap-plot-donald-trump-a-tyrant/

This wannabe kidnapper doesn't seem to be a big Trump supporter. He actually sounds more like you. There is a video of him bad mouthing Trump attached.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, NorthDallas40 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#53,208
#53,208
Behind a paywall so here’s the pdf
 

Attachments

  • Donald Trump’s faults are more libertarian than authoritarian.pdf
    129.8 KB · Views: 6
#53,212
#53,212
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
LOL .... yeah & that too. I thought I was being too blunt & to the point ..... but you nailed it solid though.
Click to expand...
I never went to kindergarten so I am a victim of the kindergarten class racist nation! I want sum retribution! (just in case komrade harris and her racist lyin' biden win like we being told)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#53,220
#53,220
AM64 said:
You said the NEJM was correct, and I said you were wrong. They printed a falsified "study" without accurately verifying it, and were forced to retract it. Not much different from what the rest of the media are doing ... neglecting the retraction, of course.

The FDA does what it does - period. No comment ... except they sometimes change positions. The FDA did withdraw approval for the use of hydroxychloroquine after the "study" was published, but it's still on the market for other uses; I suppose that is a curious position if it is just about safety.
Click to expand...

You've convoluted what really happened. Here's the truth:

"The retractions came at the request of the authors of the studies, published last month, who were not directly involved with the data collection and sources, the journals said."
 
#53,221
#53,221
MontyPython said:
You've convoluted what really happened. Here's the truth:

"The retractions came at the request of the authors of the studies, published last month, who were not directly involved with the data collection and sources, the journals said."
Click to expand...

Yes, the authors requested that NEJM and Lancet retract the study when the study came into question after publication. The fact that NEJM and Lancet published without proper review is one problem, and the authors' failure to determine the authenticity of the data they reviewed another. Nobody gets a pass on this - not a shady company holding questionable data, not the authors who didn't delve deeply enough into the authenticity of the data, and not the journals who failed in validation the accuracy of the finished report. My engineering career in diagnostics was based on testing and analysis, and to me an essential part of that was verifying proper installation and a field calibration/functional test of the instrumentation and then collecting the data. Then during analysis, if something didn't look right, it didn't come down to a question of whether the data were somehow compromised. You just don't analyze data and stake your reputation on data you don't know - not acceptable.

Calls for an outside look at the journals’ action have begun. In a statement, pyschologist Chis Chambers of Cardiff University, a member of the UK Reproducibility Network Steering Group, said: “It is right that these articles were retracted. However, the failure to resolve such basic concerns about the data during the course of normal peer review raises serious questions about the standard of editing at the Lancet and NEJM — ostensibly two of the world’s most prestigious medical journals. If these journals take issues of reproducibility and scientific integrity as seriously as they claim, then they should forthwith submit themselves and their internal review processes to an independent inquiry.”
Click to expand...

Two elite medical journals retract coronavirus papers over data integrity questions
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#53,222
#53,222
wmcovol said:
No one knows who the President will be if Biden/Harris win. Both were getting soundly beat in the Democratic primary until “someone” stopped the entire thing. Whoever that is will be the President and we don’t have a clue about them.

If America votes this kind of government in, we’re a nation of idiots & we get what we deserve.
Click to expand...
It was very early in the primary when Rep. Jim Clyburn endorsed Biden in South Carolina, which opened up some flood gates for Biden in the south... and still early in the primary when Sen. Amy Klobuchar dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden in Minnesota... which opened up the floodgates for Biden in the rust belt. It was hardly a surprise that the Democratic primary played out that way. Biden led in the polls for the duration of 2019, and was the clear frontrunner most of the time for the nomination. He was never "getting soundly beat". That is hyperbole.

We are already a nation of idiots for electing a reality show host, who is a failed business man. Electing Biden changes nothing in that regard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#53,223
#53,223
BowlBrother85 said:
It was very early in the primary when Rep. Jim Clyburn endorsed Biden in South Carolina, which opened up some flood gates for Biden in the south... and still early in the primary when Sen. Amy Klobuchar dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden in Minnesota... which opened up the floodgates for Biden in the rust belt. It was hardly a surprise that the Democratic primary played out that way. Biden led in the polls for the duration of 2019, and was the clear frontrunner most of the time for the nomination. He was never "getting soundly beat". That is hyperbole.

We are already a nation of idiots for electing a reality show host, who is a failed business man. Electing Biden changes nothing in that regard.
Click to expand...
Different day, different idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, AM64, RavinDave and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top