LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 53,884
- Likes
- 53,528
Wrong. They worked pretty well together in the mid 90s
I think it's definitely going to help him. Of course it all depends on the region as to how much it could actually help himI am thinking around 12% amongst AA, a 50% increase. And maybe 35 to 40 amongst latinos, approx 25% increase.
I think the "you ain't black narrative" will get challenged pretty hard if a couple more high profile individuals publicly leave the Dem plantation.
Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) Tweeted:
Photo shows Joe Biden meeting Hunter’s alleged business partner from Kazakhstan https://t.co/7rNzTzJvyN
I certainly was talking about the time after the Republicans took the House, but together with Clinton and the Senate, they compromised very well.Not really. They shut the .gov down 2/3 times fighting so how can you say they worked well? The only thing that got Clinton to budge was when teh Dems had their azz handed to them in his first midterm. Clinton decided he liked being POTUS and compromised some, after his reelection there was no compromise.
So you're not too smart I get it
Facebook included far-right Breitbart News in its new 'high quality' news tab
Trump leveraged foreign military aid, which had been authorized by Congress to the Ukraine, against their president's willingness to perform a campaign favor for him, by publicly announcing an investigation into the Bidens on CNN. In doing so, Trump was effectively using the promise of money in order to influence President Zelensky's professional conduct towards a course of action that personally benefitted him. That constitutes bribery (with the item of value being the campaign favor).But you called Trump a criminal...Biden has been alleged to have taken money from foreign companies while he was VP...what crimes has Trump committed while in office?
Nice try...no investigation was launched by Ukraine..money was delivered before Congressional deadline....Trump did not personally benefit like Biden has been accused...sounds like only a case that someone like Adam Schiff would pursueTrump leveraged foreign military aid, which had been authorized by Congress to the Ukraine, against their president's willingness to perform a campaign favor for him, by publicly announcing an investigation into the Bidens on CNN. In doing so, Trump was effectively using the promise of money in order to influence President Zelensky's professional conduct towards a course of action that personally benefitted him. That constitutes bribery (with the item of value being the campaign favor).
BRIBERY: the offering, giving, soliciting, or receiving of any item of value as a means of influencing the actions of an individual holding a public or legal duty.
I wasn’t trying to pick on you earlier. Just a lot of your posts come across as condescending to anyone who disagrees with you. On the above, I agree with youNo. That's not what I am saying. For example, I would think your opinions are more valid about things for which you have much more experience than the opinions from those who don't have the experience
That is not true and a Trump/White House talking point that was blatantly false. The money that was held up by Trump was late as a result of the freeze. And President Zelensky would have made that appearance on CNN if it had not been for the whistleblower's complaint.Nice try...no investigation was launched by Ukraine..money was delivered before Congressional deadline....Trump did not personally benefit like Biden has been accused...sounds like only a case that someone like Adam Schiff would pursue