2020 Presidential Race

I agree with most you say.

I hope you're not suggesting Trump tried to compromise with Democrats... for example, Trump labeled me personally as a "blue city anarchist", since I'm from a liberal city / state.

Trump's failure in my mind relates to his childish name-calling and absolute refusal to recognize the legitimate rights of those who voted against him.
I included both sides, which includes Trump, in my statement. Where we differ is you clearly think one side is better than the other while I believe both are essentially the same. Trump, Biden, it makes no difference. I've continuously said both are horrible candidates and neither should be President. Our system is broken, and has been for some time, but no one is interested in fixing it. They'd rather pick a side, red or blue, and continue down a path that gets us no where.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
This seems legit 🤔
El-dWm3WMAAiODs
I'm still curious about where this came from. Does anyone know?
It certainly generated a lot of conversation and accusations.
 
He's corrupt and bought and paid for by other countries. He's a career politician who's never accomplished a thing in his life. I don't and will not respect him.
I don't like Biden at all and you're right he's corrupt just like every politician that's held that office for the last 50 years but I'm still not going to throw a fit like the one that's been thrown the last 4 years
 
Link on specific issue?
Look at the post he responded to. I don't know if the info is factual or not, Im merely pointing out that regardless of the location, one would think the votes would represent some kind of similarity to the other 500k votes that occurred in the same city.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
Fair point, so I went back and found it.
That's only a reasonable explanation if you believe that in some random 130k pile of mail in votes EVERY SINGLE ONE was for one candidate. That's pretty much a statistical impossibility.

The only change in the math at that point was for Biden. It wasnt him gaining a majority of the mail in votes, it was him getting every single one.

Looking at the states that did allow early mail in counting I doubt you ever saw that type of performance.
 
That's only a reasonable explanation if you believe that in some random 130k pile of mail in votes EVERY SINGLE ONE was for one candidate. That's pretty much a statistical impossibility.

The only change in the math at that point was for Biden. It wasnt him gaining a majority of the mail in votes, it was him getting every single one.

Looking at the states that did allow early mail in counting I doubt you ever saw that type of performance.
No one could provide a source for that accusation.
I'm calling it bs fake news.
 

VN Store



Back
Top